Suppr超能文献

对闪烁刺激的调节反应。

Accommodation responses to flickering stimuli.

作者信息

Chauhan K, Charman W N

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, UMIST, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Sep;16(5):391-408.

PMID:8944184
Abstract

It has been suggested that accommodation to visual display unit (VDU) symbols or to stimuli lit by fluorescent tubes or similar temporally modulated light sources may be less accurate due to flicker. Furthermore, if the microfluctuations of accommodation play a part in the control of steady-state accommodation, the effects of stimulus flicker might affect the quality of this control. Experiments are described in which monocular accommodation stimulus-response curves for sinusoidal grating stimuli (1.0, 5.3 and 8.9 c/deg) were measured under the following conditions of temporal modulation: (1) square-wave on-off modulation to give spatial modulation varying between 0 and 37%; (2) sinusoidal modulation to give spatial modulation varying between 0 and 37%; (3) sinusoidal modulation to give spatial modulation varying between 16 and 32%; and (4) on-off modulation with varying mark/space ratio. Temporal modulation frequencies were between 0.5 and 7.8 Hz and above the critical fusion frequency (CFF) i.e., > or = 40 Hz. In general, the results suggest that while lower-frequency flicker may adversely affect the accuracy and stability of the accommodation response, the latter are very little affected by flicker at frequencies > or = 40 Hz. Thus flicker from fluorescent lamps or VDUs is unlikely to cause systematic accommodation difficulties. The possible relevance of the results to theories which ascribe a role for the higher-frequency (> 0.5 Hz) accommodative microfluctuations in the control of the response is considered.

摘要

有人提出,由于闪烁,对视觉显示单元(VDU)符号或由荧光灯管或类似的时间调制光源照亮的刺激的调节可能不太准确。此外,如果调节的微波动在稳态调节的控制中起作用,刺激闪烁的影响可能会影响这种控制的质量。本文描述了一些实验,其中在以下时间调制条件下测量了正弦光栅刺激(1.0、5.3和8.9周/度)的单眼调节刺激-反应曲线:(1)方波通断调制,使空间调制在0至37%之间变化;(2)正弦调制,使空间调制在0至37%之间变化;(3)正弦调制,使空间调制在16至32%之间变化;(4)具有变化的标记/间隔比的通断调制。时间调制频率在0.5至7.8赫兹之间,且高于临界融合频率(CFF),即≥40赫兹。一般来说,结果表明,虽然低频闪烁可能会对调节反应的准确性和稳定性产生不利影响,但频率≥40赫兹的闪烁对调节反应的影响很小。因此,荧光灯或VDU发出的闪烁不太可能导致系统性的调节困难。本文还考虑了这些结果与那些认为高频(>0.5赫兹)调节微波动在反应控制中起作用的理论的可能相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验