Lamy C, Sharshar T, Mas J L
Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1996 Jun-Jul;152(6-7):422-40.
The incidence, prognosis and causes of strokes associated with pregnancy or puerperium are poorly known, and we do not know whether and to what extent they differ from those of the general female population of childbearing age. Based on early and mostly hospital-based studies, it has been claimed that pregnancy increases the likelihood of cerebral infarction to about 13 times the rate expected outside of pregnancy. However, because of methodological weaknesses, these estimates must be regarded with caution. In a recent study in Ile de France, the incidence of arterial ischemic strokes associated with pregnancy or early puerperium was 4.3 per 100,000 deliveries (95% confidence interval, 2.4 to 7.1), a rate not much different from that for all women of childbearing age. Ischemic strokes related to various etiologies have been reported in pregnancy and the puerperium. Their relative frequency is poorly known because there are no recent large series of pregnancy-related ischemic strokes benefiting from detailed investigation with modern imaging techniques. Most of the known causes of ischemic stroke in the young been reported during pregnancy. In most of these conditions, it is uncertain whether pregnancy is coincidental or plays a role in the occurrence of stroke. Among pregnancy-specific causes, eclampsia may be associated with focal neurological deficits of sudden onset, consistent with a clinical diagnosis of stroke. However, the precise pathogenesis of these stroke-like focal deficits remains poorly understood. Except for some women who have persisting neurological deficits and neuroradiological abnormalities suggesting brain infarction, the reversibility of the neurological clinical signs and neuroradiological lesions within a few days or weeks in most cases argues against the existence of true cerebral ischemic necrosis. The two other pregnancy-specific causes-choriocarcinoma and amniotic fluid embolism-are rarely responsible for focal cerebral ischemia. Other diseases such as peripartum cardiomyopathy and postpartum cerebral angiopathy were initially considered as pregnancy-specific causes but subsequently reported outside of pregnancy. In a significant number of patients, the cause of the stroke remains undetermined, despite an extensive etiological workup. Whether hypercoagulable state and vessel wall changes associated with pregnancy may play a role in the occurrence of these otherwise unexplained ischemic strokes remains unknown. Too frequently, the stroke is considered at the first attempt as a complication of pregnancy and another underlying etiology may be missed. Therefore, evaluation of arterial ischemic stroke in pregnancy should proceed as in the non-pregnant state. There are no follow-up studies that consider the risk of recurrent stroke in future pregnancies. No data are available on the risk associated with use of oral contraception in a woman who had ischemic stroke during pregnancy. The frequency of cerebral venous thrombosis associated with pregnancy and the puerperium is not precisely known. Indeed, epidemiologic studies have been difficult to perform because cerebral venous thrombosis may have a misleading presentation and a definite diagnosis requires angiography, MRI or autopsy. The incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis has been estimated at 10 to 20 per 100000 deliveries in occidental countries, whereas rates of 200 to 500 per 100,000 deliveries have been reported in India. The pregnant and puerperal state accounts for 5 to 20% of all cerebral venous thrombosis in occidental countries; this proportion may reach 60% in developing countries. Labor and delivery are characteristically normal in occidental countries. The occurrence of cerebral venous thrombosis is clearly linked to the puerperial state, suggesting a direct role of the puerperial state.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
与妊娠或产褥期相关的中风的发病率、预后及病因鲜为人知,我们也不清楚它们是否与育龄期普通女性人群存在差异以及差异程度如何。基于早期且大多以医院为基础的研究,有人声称妊娠会使脑梗死的可能性增加至妊娠外预期发生率的约13倍。然而,由于方法学上的缺陷,这些估计必须谨慎看待。在法国岛的一项近期研究中,与妊娠或早期产褥期相关的动脉缺血性中风的发病率为每10万例分娩4.3例(95%置信区间为2.4至7.1),这一发生率与所有育龄期女性的发病率并无太大差异。妊娠和产褥期已报告了与各种病因相关的缺血性中风。由于近期没有大量受益于现代成像技术详细检查的与妊娠相关的缺血性中风系列研究,其相对频率鲜为人知。已知的年轻人缺血性中风的大多数病因在妊娠期间都有报告。在大多数这些情况下,不确定妊娠是巧合还是在中风发生中起作用。在特定于妊娠的病因中,子痫可能与突然发作的局灶性神经功能缺损有关,符合中风的临床诊断。然而,这些类似中风的局灶性缺损的确切发病机制仍知之甚少。除了一些有持续神经功能缺损和神经放射学异常提示脑梗死的女性外,大多数情况下神经临床体征和神经放射学病变在数天或数周内的可逆性表明不存在真正的脑缺血坏死。另外两个特定于妊娠的病因——绒毛膜癌和羊水栓塞——很少导致局灶性脑缺血。其他疾病如围产期心肌病和产后脑血管病最初被认为是特定于妊娠的病因,但随后在妊娠外也有报告。在相当数量的患者中,尽管进行了广泛的病因检查,中风的病因仍未确定。与妊娠相关的高凝状态和血管壁变化是否可能在这些不明原因的缺血性中风的发生中起作用尚不清楚。太频繁地,中风在首次诊断时就被认为是妊娠的并发症,而其他潜在病因可能被遗漏。因此,对妊娠期间动脉缺血性中风的评估应与非妊娠状态下一样进行。没有随访研究考虑未来妊娠中复发性中风的风险。对于在妊娠期间发生缺血性中风的女性使用口服避孕药相关的风险没有数据。与妊娠和产褥期相关的脑静脉血栓形成的频率并不确切知晓。实际上,流行病学研究很难进行,因为脑静脉血栓形成可能有误导性表现,明确诊断需要血管造影、磁共振成像或尸检。在西方国家,脑静脉血栓形成的发病率估计为每10万例分娩10至20例,而在印度报告的发病率为每10万例分娩200至500例。在西方国家,妊娠和产褥期状态占所有脑静脉血栓形成的5%至20%;在发展中国家,这一比例可能达到60%。在西方国家,分娩通常是正常的。脑静脉血栓形成的发生显然与产褥期状态有关,表明产褥期状态起直接作用。(摘要截选)