• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌治疗的选择性方法。

Selective approach to the treatment of oesophageal cancer.

作者信息

Junginger T, Dutkowski P

机构信息

Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, University of Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1996 Oct;83(10):1473-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800831047.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800831047
PMID:8944477
Abstract

Between September 1985 and December 1994, 322 patients with oesophageal cancer were treated. Of the 190 patients who underwent operation, 173 had an oesophageal resection; in 124 this was performed as an abdominothoracic resection and in 49 by the transhiatal approach. The assessment of radicality after histological examination revealed a curative (R0) resection in 121 patients (70 per cent) and a palliative (R1-R2) resection in 52 (30 per cent). Prognosis was correlated with the extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection. In 77 patients with stage pT1-3 pN0-1 pM0 the 5-year survival rate was 40 per cent after abdominothoracic resection with two-field lymph node dissection and zero after transhiatal resection (P = 0.01). The authors propose a differentiated surgical approach involving abdominothoracic resection with two-field lymph node dissection for patients with limited tumours (pT1-3 pN0-1 M0) if the operative risk is tolerable. Transhiatal resection appears to be effective only in patients with early tumours (Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum stage 0).

摘要

1985年9月至1994年12月期间,共治疗了322例食管癌患者。在190例接受手术的患者中,173例行食管切除术;其中124例采用胸腹联合切除术,49例采用经裂孔途径。组织学检查后对根治性的评估显示,121例患者(70%)为根治性(R0)切除,52例患者(30%)为姑息性(R1-R2)切除。预后与纵隔淋巴结清扫范围相关。在77例pT1-3 pN0-1 pM0期患者中,胸腹联合切除并进行两野淋巴结清扫后的5年生存率为40%,经裂孔切除后的5年生存率为零(P = 0.01)。作者建议,对于肿瘤局限(pT1-3 pN0-1 M0)且手术风险可耐受的患者,采用包括胸腹联合切除并进行两野淋巴结清扫的差异化手术方法。经裂孔切除似乎仅对早期肿瘤患者(国际抗癌联盟0期)有效。

相似文献

1
Selective approach to the treatment of oesophageal cancer.食管癌治疗的选择性方法。
Br J Surg. 1996 Oct;83(10):1473-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800831047.
2
[Differentiated surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma].[食管癌的差异化手术治疗]
Chirurg. 1995 Jul;66(7):693-703.
3
New insights in the lymphatic spread of oesophageal cancer and its implications for the extent of surgical resection.食管癌淋巴转移的新见解及其对手术切除范围的影响。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(5):893-906. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.03.010.
4
[Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: prognostic comparison between transthoracic esophageal resection with expanded 2-field lymph node dissection and trans-hiatal esophageal dissection with abdominal lymph node excision].[食管癌:经胸食管切除术联合扩大二野淋巴结清扫与经裂孔食管切除术联合腹部淋巴结切除的预后比较]
Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2002;119:333-8.
5
Value of endoscopic ultrasonography as a predictor of long-term survival in oesophageal carcinoma.内镜超声检查作为食管癌长期生存预测指标的价值
Br J Surg. 2003 Nov;90(11):1367-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4307.
6
Lymph node micrometastasis and prognosis in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌患者的淋巴结微转移与预后
Br J Surg. 2001 Mar;88(3):426-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01687.x.
7
[Analysis of the survival in patients after surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer].[胸段食管癌手术切除术后患者的生存分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;31(7):541-5.
8
Ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes as a predictor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.侵袭性淋巴结与清除性淋巴结的比例作为食管鳞状细胞癌生存的预测指标。
Br J Surg. 1994 Mar;81(3):410-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810330.
9
Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy.两野淋巴结清扫的根治性食管切除术后的复发模式。
Br J Surg. 2000 Oct;87(10):1426-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01541.x.
10
A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resections on the prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.经裂孔与经胸食管鳞状细胞癌切除术对患者预后的比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 Sep;32(7):749-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.048. Epub 2006 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.外科文献中并发症报告的质量。
Ann Surg. 2002 Jun;235(6):803-13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00007.