Suppr超能文献

所选心房起搏模式的长期生存率。

Long-term survival of chosen atrial-based pacing modalities.

作者信息

Irwin M, Carbol B, Senaratne M, Gulamhusein S

机构信息

Division of Cardiology and Cardiac Pacing, Grey Nuns Community Health Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 2):1796-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03227.x.

Abstract

Atrial-based cardiac pacing modalities were chosen in 341 of 684 (50%) patients selected for permanent cardiac pacing at the Grey Nuns Community Health Center between 1989 and 1995. There were 183 males and 158 females. Mean age was 70 years (range 8-97 years). The indications for atrial-based pacing were: advanced atrioventricular (AV) block (n = 166) 49%; sick sinus syndrome (n = 153) 45%; hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome (n = 11) 3%; neurocardiac syncope (n = 10) 2.9%; and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1) 0.3%. Forty-eight patients had a known history of paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. All patients had routine follow-up performed at 24 hours, 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, and then 6 biannually. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years (range 1 month to 12 years). Observed survival of the programmed atrial-based modality was compared to the original mode chosen at the time of implantation. Thirty-five of 37 (95%) chosen for AAIR modes remain programmed AAIR. Twenty-two of 24 (92%) chosen for VDDR modes remain programmed VDDR. Two hundred and fifty-five of 280 (91%) chosen for DDD or DDDR modes remain programmed DDDR. Two of 37 (5%) patients originally implanted with AAI pacing systems were upgraded to DDDR mode due to new onset AV block. One of 24 (4%) patients originally implanted with a VDDR pacing system was upgraded to DDDR due to loss of atrial sensing of the single pass lead. Twenty-six of 304 (8.5%) patients originally implanted with DDD/DDDR (n = 25) and VDDR (n = 1) pacing systems were reprogrammed to VVI or VVIR: 16 (62%) due to sustained refractory atrial arrhythmias; 5 (19%) due to atrial lead malfunction; and 5 (19%) due to reasons unrelated to the pacing system. With careful review of the patients' conduction disorder and appropriate selection of pacing modality, the observed survival of long-term atrial-based pacing remains at 92% when compared to the chosen modality at the time of implantation. Atrial-based pacing may be used to reduce the incidence of atrial dysrhythmia with careful programming of the base atrial pacing rates.

摘要

1989年至1995年期间,在格雷修女社区健康中心选择进行永久性心脏起搏的684例患者中,有341例(50%)选择了基于心房的心脏起搏方式。其中男性183例,女性158例。平均年龄为70岁(范围8 - 97岁)。基于心房起搏的适应证为:高度房室传导阻滞(166例)49%;病态窦房结综合征(153例)45%;高敏性颈动脉窦综合征(11例)3%;神经心源性晕厥(10例)2.9%;肥厚型心肌病(1例)0.3%。48例患者有阵发性房性心律失常病史。所有患者在术后24小时、7天、6周、3个月进行常规随访,之后每半年随访一次。平均随访时间为6.5年(范围1个月至12年)。将程控的基于心房的起搏方式的实际使用寿命与植入时选择的原始方式进行比较。选择AAIR模式的37例患者中有35例(95%)仍程控为AAIR模式。选择VDDR模式的24例患者中有22例(92%)仍程控为VDDR模式。选择DDD或DDDR模式的280例患者中有255例(91%)仍程控为DDDR模式。最初植入AAI起搏系统的37例患者中有2例(5%)因新发房室传导阻滞升级为DDDR模式。最初植入VDDR起搏系统的24例患者中有1例(4%)因单极导线心房感知功能丧失升级为DDDR模式。最初植入DDD/DDDR(25例)和VDDR(1例)起搏系统的304例患者中有26例(8.5%)被重新程控为VVI或VVIR:16例(62%)是由于持续性难治性房性心律失常;5例(19%)是由于心房导线故障;5例(19%)是由于与起搏系统无关的原因。通过仔细评估患者的传导障碍并适当选择起搏方式,与植入时选择的方式相比,长期基于心房起搏的实际使用寿命仍保持在92%。通过仔细程控基础心房起搏频率,基于心房的起搏可用于降低房性心律失常的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验