Llewellyn J, Giese R, Nosek L J, Lager J D, Turco S J, Goodell J, Coleman J, McQuone M J, Collier P A, Minard D A
Nurs Econ. 1994 Jul-Aug;12(4):208-14.
A multicenter study of the overall costs and impact on medication administration of sterile cartridge-needle units (Carpuject) and conventional disposable syringes with multiple- and single-dose vials was conducted in six hospitals in the Voluntary Hospitals of America (VHA) system. Data collection involved a time and motion phase measuring procurement, preparation, and disposal of both systems and a 6-month prospective global cost analysis of component costs, waste disposal, nursing time, needlestick injuries, and subsequent treatment. Nonacquisition costs were substantially lower with the use of the cartridge-needle units. When all costs are considered, sterile cartridge-needle units are a cost-effective alternative to conventional disposable syringes and multidose vials.
在美国志愿医院协会(VHA)系统的六家医院进行了一项多中心研究,比较了无菌卡式注射器-针头装置(卡普捷注射器)与配备多剂量和单剂量药瓶的传统一次性注射器在总体成本以及对药物给药的影响。数据收集包括一个时间与动作阶段,用于测量两种系统的采购、准备和处置情况,以及为期6个月的前瞻性全局成本分析,涵盖组件成本、废物处置、护理时间、针刺伤及后续治疗。使用卡式注射器-针头装置时,非采购成本大幅降低。综合考虑所有成本,无菌卡式注射器-针头装置是传统一次性注射器和多剂量药瓶的一种具有成本效益的替代方案。