• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人的公平/不公平及监护模式

Equity/inequity and patterns of guardianship of older persons.

作者信息

Keith P M

机构信息

Iowa State University, Ames, USA.

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1996;43(2):155-68. doi: 10.2190/RRAM-UP5B-XBR7-G4HA.

DOI:10.2190/RRAM-UP5B-XBR7-G4HA
PMID:8945646
Abstract

There have been recent reforms of guardianship systems focusing on the rights of older persons in Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Germany, and the United States. Little is known, however, about the lives of guardians. Equity theory guided the investigation of four styles of guardianship: the tough, sympathetic, challenged, and sad. Among 317 guardians, perceptions of inequity and benefit differentiated the sad and tough from others. Implications for practice are suggested.

摘要

最近,澳大利亚、奥地利、加拿大、英国、德国和美国针对老年人权利对监护制度进行了改革。然而,人们对监护人的生活却知之甚少。公平理论指导了对四种监护方式的调查:强硬型、同情型、受挑战型和悲伤型。在317名监护人中,不公平感和受益感将悲伤型监护人和强硬型监护人与其他类型区分开来。文中还提出了对实践的启示。

相似文献

1
Equity/inequity and patterns of guardianship of older persons.老年人的公平/不公平及监护模式
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1996;43(2):155-68. doi: 10.2190/RRAM-UP5B-XBR7-G4HA.
2
The strain of guardianship for men in the United States.
J Soc Psychol. 1999 Feb;139(1):69-78. doi: 10.1080/00224549909598362.
3
Adult guardianship: human rights or social justice?成人监护:人权还是社会正义?
J Law Med. 2010 Sep;18(1):143-55.
4
Attitudes of legal guardians and legally supervised persons with and without previous research experience towards participation in research projects: A quantitative cross-sectional study.有/无先前研究经验的法定监护人及法定被监管人对参与研究项目的态度:一项定量横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0256689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256689. eCollection 2021.
5
Guardianship determinations by judges, attorneys, and guardians.法官、律师和监护人做出的监护权判定。
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(3):339-53. doi: 10.1002/bsl.772.
6
Guardianship for your own good: Improving the well-being of respondents and wards in the USA.为了你好而监护:改善美国被申请人和被监护人的福祉。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(5-6):350-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
7
Attitudes toward guardianship, social work goals, and perspectives of disability among social work students.社会工作学生对监护、社会工作目标和残疾的态度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Mar;42(5):712-721. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1508510. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
8
Retrospective analysis of guardians' perceptions of cognitively impaired elderly.
J Prof Nurs. 1992 Mar-Apr;8(2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90066-8.
9
Aging in the shadow of the law: the case of elder guardianship in Israel.法律阴影下的老龄化:以色列老年监护案例
J Aging Soc Policy. 2004;16(4):59-77. doi: 10.1300/J031v16n04_04.
10
Elderly wards and their legal guardians: analysis of county probate records in Ohio and Washington.老年病房及其法定监护人:俄亥俄州和华盛顿州县遗嘱认证记录分析
Gerontologist. 1991 Apr;31(2):156-64. doi: 10.1093/geront/31.2.156.