• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钠通道阻滞对双相电击与单相电击除颤能量需求的影响。

The influence of sodium channel blockade on the defibrillation energy requirements of biphasic versus monophasic shocks.

作者信息

Nelson S D, Lenhart M B, Saffarin A

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 1):1568-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03182.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03182.x
PMID:8946452
Abstract

The sodium channel-blocking actions of some Class I antiarrhythmic agents can increase the defibrillation energy requirements (DER) of monophasic shock waveforms. The influence of sodium channel blockade on biphasic shocks is less certain. The purpose of this study was to compare, in a randomized, placebo controlled study, the influence of lidocaine on the DER of biphasic and monophasic shock waveforms in a canine model of transvenous internal defibrillation. The DER was determined by the iterative increment-decrement protocol. Monophasic and biphasic shock DERs were tested at baseline and during lidocaine infusion (group A) or saline control (group B). Group A biphasic shock DERs increased significantly from a baseline of 12.1 +/- 3.6 J to 19.1 +/- 9.3 J when compared to group B (P = 0.005). In group A, the mean DER during lidocaine was significantly higher with monophasic shocks than biphasic shocks (29.6 +/- 11.8 J vs 19.1 +/- 9.3 J, respectively; P < 0.003), but the magnitude of change in biphasic versus monophasic shock DERs was not significantly different (F = 1.78; p = 0.193). There was a linear relationship between the baseline DER and the DER during lidocaine (r2 = 0.63, P < 0.0001). Sodium channel blockade with lidocaine increases the DER of both monophasic and biphasic shocks. However, the DER of biphasic shocks during lidocaine are significantly lower than monophasic shock DERs, a finding that can be explained by the linear relationship between the baseline DER and the DER during lidocaine. These results may have favorable implications for the use of Class I antiarrhythmics with biphasic shock defibrillators.

摘要

某些Ⅰ类抗心律失常药物的钠通道阻滞作用可增加单相电击波形的除颤能量需求(DER)。钠通道阻滞对双相电击的影响尚不确定。本研究的目的是在一项随机、安慰剂对照研究中,比较利多卡因对经静脉体内除颤犬模型中双相和单相电击波形DER的影响。DER通过迭代增减方案确定。在基线时以及利多卡因输注期间(A组)或生理盐水对照期间(B组)测试单相和双相电击DER。与B组相比,A组双相电击DER从基线的12.1±3.6 J显著增加至19.1±9.3 J(P = 0.005)。在A组中,利多卡因作用期间单相电击的平均DER显著高于双相电击(分别为29.6±11.8 J和19.1±9.3 J;P < 0.003),但双相电击与单相电击DER的变化幅度无显著差异(F = 1.78;p = 0.193)。基线DER与利多卡因作用期间的DER之间存在线性关系(r2 = 0.63,P < 0.0001)。利多卡因引起的钠通道阻滞增加了单相和双相电击的DER。然而,利多卡因作用期间双相电击的DER显著低于单相电击的DER,这一发现可用基线DER与利多卡因作用期间的DER之间的线性关系来解释。这些结果可能对Ⅰ类抗心律失常药物与双相电击除颤器的联合使用具有有利意义。

相似文献

1
The influence of sodium channel blockade on the defibrillation energy requirements of biphasic versus monophasic shocks.钠通道阻滞对双相电击与单相电击除颤能量需求的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 1):1568-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03182.x.
2
Lidocaine increases the proarrhythmic effects of monophasic but not biphasic shocks.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Dec;12(12):1363-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.01363.x.
3
Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements.阳极单相电击与阴极双相电击在除颤能量需求方面的前瞻性随机比较。
Am Heart J. 1996 May;131(5):961-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90180-5.
4
Differential effects of lidocaine on defibrillation threshold with monophasic versus biphasic shock waveforms.利多卡因对单相与双相电击波形除颤阈值的不同影响。
Circulation. 1995 Sep 15;92(6):1644-50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.6.1644.
5
The influence of specific and nonspecific potassium current blockade on the defibrillation energy requirement of biphasic shock.特异性和非特异性钾电流阻滞对双相电击除颤能量需求的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jan;22(1 Pt 2):147-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00322.x.
6
Relation between shock-related myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a canine model.犬模型中休克相关性心肌损伤与单相和双相电击除颤疗效的关系。
Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5):2501-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.5.2501.
7
Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials.经胸除颤的双相和单相电击:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Resuscitation. 2003 Jul;58(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00077-7.
8
Effects of azimilide, acidemia, and the combination on defibrillation energy requirements.阿齐利特、酸血症及其联合作用对除颤能量需求的影响。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000 Sep;36(3):283-7. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200009000-00001.
9
Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.短暂性室颤的经胸除颤:一项比较低能量双相直线波与单相阻尼正弦波电击疗效的随机试验
Acta Cardiol. 2002 Oct;57(5):329-34. doi: 10.2143/AC.57.5.2005448.
10
The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.双相和传统单相除颤对复苏后心肌功能的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Sep;34(3):815-22. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00270-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of general anesthesia on the defibrillation energy requirement in patients undergoing defibrillator implantation.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Dec;3(4):325-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1009831802964.