• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次剂量的奥美拉唑(40毫克和20毫克)与安慰剂治疗良性胃溃疡的比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲研究。

Comparison of once-daily doses of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg) and placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

Valenzuela J E, Kogut D G, McCullough A J, Colón Pagán J R, Shah U, Whipple J, Gilde L R, Simon T J

机构信息

University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Dec;91(12):2516-22.

PMID:8946978
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, conducted in 520 patients, was to compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg once daily) with placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer.

METHODS

Treatment with omeprazole or placebo lasted 4 wk; those whose ulcers remained unhealed continued the same treatment regimen for an additional 4 wk. The effects of therapy were determined by endoscopy and assessment of GI symptoms. Safety and tolerability were evaluated through reported adverse events, physical examinations, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

At weeks 4 and 8, the proportion of patients with healed ulcers was significantly greater in the omeprazole 40- and 20-mg groups than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). At week 8, the healing rate was significantly greater in the 40-mg group than in the 20-mg group (82.7 vs 74.8%, p < 0.05). In patients with large ulcers (>1 cm), the 40-mg regimen was associated with a significantly higher healing rate (78.9%) than both the 20-mg regimen (61.4%) and placebo (34.6%) at week 8 (p < 0.05 vs omeprazole 20 mg; p < 0.01 vs placebo). Healing rates in patients with small ulcers were similar for the 40- and 20-mg groups. Omeprazole was well tolerated, with no significant differences versus placebo in the overall incidence of clinical or laboratory adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole 40 and 20 mg, administered once daily, healed a significantly greater proportion of patients than did placebo. The 40-mg regimen offered significant advantages over the 20-mg regimen in patients with large ulcers.

摘要

目的

这项多中心、随机、双盲研究纳入了520例患者,旨在比较奥美拉唑(每日一次,40毫克和20毫克)与安慰剂治疗良性胃溃疡的疗效和安全性。

方法

奥美拉唑或安慰剂治疗持续4周;溃疡未愈合的患者继续相同治疗方案4周。通过内镜检查和胃肠道症状评估确定治疗效果。通过报告的不良事件、体格检查和实验室检查评估安全性和耐受性。

结果

在第4周和第8周时,奥美拉唑40毫克组和20毫克组溃疡愈合患者的比例显著高于安慰剂组(p<0.01)。在第8周时,40毫克组的愈合率显著高于20毫克组(82.7%对74.8%,p<0.05)。在大溃疡(>1厘米)患者中,第8周时40毫克治疗方案的愈合率(78.9%)显著高于20毫克治疗方案(61.4%)和安慰剂(34.6%)(与奥美拉唑20毫克相比,p<0.05;与安慰剂相比,p<0.01)。40毫克组和20毫克组小溃疡患者的愈合率相似。奥美拉唑耐受性良好,临床或实验室不良事件的总发生率与安慰剂相比无显著差异。

结论

每日一次服用40毫克和20毫克的奥美拉唑治愈的患者比例显著高于安慰剂。在大溃疡患者中,40毫克治疗方案比20毫克治疗方案具有显著优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of once-daily doses of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg) and placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.每日一次剂量的奥美拉唑(40毫克和20毫克)与安慰剂治疗良性胃溃疡的比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Dec;91(12):2516-22.
2
Comparison of once daily doses of lansoprazole (15, 30, and 60 mg) and placebo in patients with gastric ulcer.每日一次服用兰索拉唑(15毫克、30毫克和60毫克)与安慰剂对胃溃疡患者疗效的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Aug;90(8):1289-94.
3
Effect of omeprazole and ranitidine on ulcer healing and relapse rates in patients with benign gastric ulcer.奥美拉唑和雷尼替丁对良性胃溃疡患者溃疡愈合及复发率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):69-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200201.
4
Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescent patients: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.混合安非他明盐缓释剂(阿得拉XR)治疗青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效与安全性:一项为期4周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):266-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.011.
5
A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study of omeprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer in Israel.
Isr J Med Sci. 1994 Oct;30(10):757-61.
6
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
7
Ranitidine 300 mg at bedtime is effective for gastric ulcers: a 12-wk, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. The Ranitidine 300 mg HS Gastric Ulcer Study Group.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Jul;88(7):1071-5.
8
Omeprazole 20 mg uid and ranitidine 150 mg bid in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer. Italian Cooperative Group on Omeprazole.奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次及雷尼替丁150毫克每日两次治疗良性胃溃疡。意大利奥美拉唑协作组
Hepatogastroenterology. 1991 Oct;38(5):400-3.
9
Anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment in bleeding ulcers: randomized controlled trial comparing 2-day versus 7-day bismuth quadruple therapy.出血性溃疡的抗幽门螺杆菌治疗:比较2天与7天铋剂四联疗法的随机对照试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;92(3):438-41.
10
Histological aspects and healing rates of gastric ulcers treated with omeprazole 20 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg B.I.D.
Panminerva Med. 1989 Apr-Jun;31(2):94-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Gastric Ulcers: Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis With Cross-Inference Through a Quality management System.钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂与质子泵抑制剂治疗胃溃疡的疗效:通过质量管理体系进行交叉推断的贝叶斯和频率学派网络荟萃分析
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2025 Feb 5;102:100776. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2025.100776. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical outcomes of marginal ulcer bleeding compared with those of peptic ulcer bleeding.比较边缘性溃疡出血和消化性溃疡出血的临床转归。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3852-3860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09871-5. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
3
Safety assessment of omeprazole use: a review.
奥美拉唑使用的安全性评估:一项综述。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2018 Nov-Dec;136(6):557-570. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0019220318.
4
Association between proton pump inhibitors and respiratory infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.质子泵抑制剂与呼吸道感染之间的关联:一项临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep;22(9):761-6. doi: 10.1155/2008/821385.
5
Community-acquired pneumonia and acid-suppressive drugs: position statement.社区获得性肺炎与抑酸药物:立场声明
Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;20(2):119-21, 123-5. doi: 10.1155/2006/324976.
6
Optimising acid inhibition treatment.优化抑酸治疗
Drugs. 2005;65 Suppl 1:25-33. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565001-00005.
7
Single-isomer drugs: true therapeutic advances.单一异构体药物:真正的治疗进展。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(5):279-85. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443050-00001.
8
Are proton pump inhibitors the first choice for acute treatment of gastric ulcers? A meta analysis of randomized clinical trials.质子泵抑制剂是胃溃疡急性治疗的首选药物吗?一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul 15;2:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-230x-2-17.
9
Formulary management of proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂的处方集管理
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Sep;16(3):225-46. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916030-00002.
10
Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders.质子泵抑制剂。用于胃肠道疾病的药理学及应用原理。
Drugs. 1998 Sep;56(3):307-35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856030-00002.