Arias-Vimárlund V, Ljunggren M, Timpka T
Department of Computer Science, Linköping University, Sweden.
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:503-7.
Exploration of the societal health economic effects occurring during the first year after implementation of Computerised Patient Records (CPRs) at Primary Health Care (PHC) centres.
Comparative case studies of practice processes and their consequences one year after CPR implementation, using the constant comparison method. Application of transaction-cost analyses at a societal level on the results.
Two urban PHC centres under a managed care contract in Ostergötland county, Sweden.
Central implementation issues. First-year societal direct normal costs, direct unexpected costs, and indirect costs. Societal benefits.
The total societal effect of the CPR implementation was a cost of nearly 250,000 SEK (USD 37,000) per GP team. About 20% of the effect consisted of direct unexpected costs, accured from the reduction of practitioners' leisure time. The main issues in the implementation process were medical informatics knowledge and computer skills, adaptation of the human-computer interaction design to practice routines, and information access through the CPR.
The societal costs exceed the benefits during the first year after CPR implementation at the observed PHC centres. Early investments in requirements engineering and staff training may increase the efficiency. Exploitation of the CPR for disease prevention and clinical quality improvement is necessary to defend the investment in societal terms. The exact calculation of societal costs requires further analysis of the affected groups' willingness to pay.
探讨在初级卫生保健(PHC)中心实施计算机化患者记录(CPR)后的第一年所产生的社会健康经济影响。
采用持续比较法,对CPR实施一年后的实践过程及其后果进行比较案例研究。在社会层面上对结果应用交易成本分析。
瑞典东约特兰郡两个签订了管理式医疗合同的城市初级卫生保健中心。
核心实施问题。第一年的社会直接正常成本、直接意外成本和间接成本。社会效益。
实施CPR的总体社会影响是每个全科医生团队成本近250,000瑞典克朗(37,000美元)。约20%的影响包括直接意外成本,这是由于从业者休闲时间减少而产生的。实施过程中的主要问题是医学信息学知识和计算机技能、人机交互设计与实践流程的适配,以及通过CPR获取信息。
在所观察的初级卫生保健中心,实施CPR后的第一年社会成本超过了效益。在需求工程和员工培训方面的早期投资可能会提高效率。从社会层面捍卫投资,利用CPR进行疾病预防和临床质量改进是必要的。社会成本的确切计算需要进一步分析受影响群体的支付意愿。