Suppr超能文献

烷基烷醇胺的急性毒性和原发性刺激

Acute toxicity and primary irritancy of alkylalkanolamines.

作者信息

Ballantyne B, Leung H W

机构信息

Applied Toxicology Group, Union Carbide Corporation, Danbury, Connecticut 06817, USA.

出版信息

Vet Hum Toxicol. 1996 Dec;38(6):422-6.

PMID:8948072
Abstract

The acute handling hazards of several alkylalkanolamines were determined by investigating their potential acute toxicity and primary irritancy. Materials studied were N-methylethanolamine (MEA), N, N, -dimethylethanolamine (DMEA), N, N, -dimethylisopropanolamine (DMIPA), N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), and tertbutyldiethanolamine (BDEA). All these alkylalkanolamines were of comparable acute peroral toxicity in the rat (LD50 range 1.48-2.83 ml/kg). By 24 h occluded epicutaneous contact in the rabbit, MEA, DMEA and DMIPA were of moderate acute percutaneous toxicity (LD50 range 1.13-2.0 ml/kg), MDEA was of slight acute percutaneous toxicity (LD50 male 9.85 ml/kg, female 10.90 ml/kg), and BDEA of intermediate toxicity (LD50 6.4 ml/kg). Due to differences in vapor pressure the acute vapor exposure toxicity of the alkylalkanolamines to rats varied; MEA, MDEA and BDEA were of a low order of acute toxicity, and DMIPA was moderately toxic with an LT50 of 3.2 h for a saturated vapor atmosphere exposure. A 4 h-LC50 (rat combined sex) of 1461 ppm was determined for DMEA. All alkylalkanolamines studied, except MDEA, were moderately to markedly irritating and caused variable degrees of skin corrosivity; MDEA caused only transient minor skin irritation. In accord with the skin irritancy results, the eye irritancy from 0.005 ml MEA, DMEA, DMIPA and BDEA was severe, and that from MDEA was slight. Exposure to these compounds has implications for occupational health procedures.

摘要

通过研究几种烷基烷醇胺的潜在急性毒性和原发性刺激,确定了它们的急性操作危害。所研究的材料有N-甲基乙醇胺(MEA)、N,N-二甲基乙醇胺(DMEA)、N,N-二甲基异丙醇胺(DMIPA)、N-甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)和叔丁基二乙醇胺(BDEA)。所有这些烷基烷醇胺对大鼠的急性经口毒性相当(半数致死量范围为1.48 - 2.83毫升/千克)。在兔子身上进行24小时封闭性皮肤接触试验,MEA、DMEA和DMIPA具有中等急性经皮毒性(半数致死量范围为1.13 - 2.0毫升/千克),MDEA具有轻微急性经皮毒性(雄性半数致死量为9.85毫升/千克,雌性为10.90毫升/千克),BDEA具有中等毒性(半数致死量为6.4毫升/千克)。由于蒸气压不同,烷基烷醇胺对大鼠的急性蒸气暴露毒性有所差异;MEA、MDEA和BDEA的急性毒性较低,DMIPA具有中等毒性,在饱和蒸气气氛暴露下的半数致死时间为3.2小时。测定DMEA的4小时半数致死浓度(大鼠混合性别)为1461 ppm。除MDEA外,所有研究的烷基烷醇胺都有中度至明显的刺激性,并导致不同程度的皮肤腐蚀性;MDEA仅引起短暂轻微的皮肤刺激。与皮肤刺激性结果一致,0.005毫升MEA、DMEA、DMIPA和BDEA引起的眼刺激性严重,而MDEA引起的眼刺激性轻微。接触这些化合物对职业健康程序有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验