• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同的生化控制定义评估接受局部前列腺照射治疗的患者结局的变异性。

Assessing the variability of outcome for patients treated with localized prostate irradiation using different definitions of biochemical control.

作者信息

Horwitz E M, Vicini F A, Ziaja E L, Gonzalez J, Dmuchowski C F, Stromberg J S, Brabbins D S, Hollander J, Chen P Y, Martinez A A

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Oct 1;36(3):565-71. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00360-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00360-4
PMID:8948340
Abstract

PURPOSE

Biochemical control using serial posttreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels is being increasingly used to assess treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. However, no standardized definition of biochemical control has been established. We reviewed our experience treating patients with localized prostate cancer and applied three different commonly used definitions of biochemical control to determine if differences in therapeutic outcome would be observed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1987 and December 1991, 480 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital. The median dose to the prostate was 66.6 Gy (range 58-70.4) using a four-field or arc technique. Pretreatment and posttreatment serum PSA levels were recorded. Over 86% (414 of 480) of patients had a pretreatment PSA level available. Three different definitions of biochemical control were used: (a) PSA nadir < 1 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment completion. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase; (b) PSA nadir < 1.5 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment completion. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase; (c) Posttreatment PSA nadir < 4 ng/ml without a time limit. Once the nadir was achieved, if it did not rise above normal the patient was considered to be biochemically controlled. Clinical local control was defined as no palpable prostate nodularity beyond 18 months, no new prostate nodularity, or a negative prostate biopsy.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months (range 3-112). Pretreatment PSA values were correlated with treatment outcome using the three definitions of biochemical control as well as clinical local control. Pretreatment PSA values were stratified into five groups (Group 1: PSA < 4; Group 2: PSA 4-10; Group 3: PSA 10-15; Group 4: PSA 15-20; and Group 5: PSA > 20), and 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were calculated using the three biochemical control and one clinical local control definitions. For Group 1, 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were 84%, 90%, 91%, and 96% for Definitions 1-3 and clinical local control, respectively. For Group 2, 5-year actuarial control rates were 45%, 54%, 74%, and 92% for the four definitions, respectively. For Group 3, 5-year actuarial control rates were 26%, 31%, 63%, and 100% for the four definitions, respectively. For Group 4, 5-year actuarial control rates were 24%, 24%, 50%, and 100% for the four definitions, respectively. Finally, for Group 5, 5-year actuarial control rates were 5%, 14%, 15%, and 89% for the four definitions, respectively. Depending on the definition used, statistically significant differences overall in outcome rates were observed. Differences between all four definitions for all pairwise comparisons ranged from 5 to 53% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When different definitions of biochemical control are used in assessing treatment outcome, significantly different rates of success are noted. Until a standardized definition of biochemical control is adopted, differences in treatment outcome cannot be meaningfully compared.

摘要

目的

利用系列治疗后血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平进行生化控制越来越多地用于评估局限性前列腺癌的治疗效果。然而,尚未建立生化控制的标准化定义。我们回顾了治疗局限性前列腺癌患者的经验,并应用三种不同的常用生化控制定义来确定是否会观察到治疗结果的差异。

方法和材料

1987年1月至1991年12月期间,480例临床局限性前列腺癌患者在威廉·博蒙特医院使用局部前列腺野接受外照射放疗(RT)。采用四野或弧形技术,前列腺的中位剂量为66.6 Gy(范围58 - 70.4)。记录治疗前和治疗后的血清PSA水平。超过86%(480例中的414例)患者有治疗前PSA水平数据。使用三种不同的生化控制定义:(a)治疗完成后1年内PSA最低点<1 ng/ml。达到最低点后,如果注意到PSA连续两次升高,则在首次升高时将患者记为失败;(b)治疗完成后1年内PSA最低点<1.5 ng/ml。达到最低点后,如果注意到PSA连续两次升高,则在首次升高时将患者记为失败;(c)治疗后PSA最低点<4 ng/ml,无时间限制。一旦达到最低点,如果未升至正常水平以上,则认为患者生化控制良好。临床局部控制定义为18个月后无可触及的前列腺结节、无新的前列腺结节或前列腺活检阴性。

结果

中位随访时间为48个月(范围3 - 112个月)。使用生化控制的三种定义以及临床局部控制定义,治疗前PSA值与治疗结果相关。将治疗前PSA值分为五组(第1组:PSA<4;第2组:PSA 4 - 10;第3组:PSA 10 - 15;第4组:PSA 15 - 20;第5组:PSA>20),并使用三种生化控制定义和一种临床局部控制定义计算5年生化控制精算率。对于第1组,定义1 - 3和临床局部控制的5年生化控制精算率分别为84%、90%、91%和96%。对于第2组,四种定义的5年精算控制率分别为45%、54%、74%和92%。对于第3组,四种定义的5年精算控制率分别为26%、31%、63%和100%。对于第4组,四种定义的5年精算控制率分别为24%、24%、50%和100%。最后,对于第5组,四种定义的5年精算控制率分别为5%、14%、15%和89%。根据所使用的定义,总体上观察到结果率有统计学显著差异。所有四个定义之间所有两两比较的差异范围为5%至53%(p<0.001)。

结论

在评估治疗结果时使用不同的生化控制定义,会注意到成功率有显著差异。在采用生化控制的标准化定义之前,无法有意义地比较治疗结果的差异。

相似文献

1
Assessing the variability of outcome for patients treated with localized prostate irradiation using different definitions of biochemical control.使用不同的生化控制定义评估接受局部前列腺照射治疗的患者结局的变异性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Oct 1;36(3):565-71. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00360-4.
2
Defining biochemical cure for prostate carcinoma patients treated with external beam radiation therapy.定义接受外照射放疗的前列腺癌患者的生化治愈标准。
Cancer. 1999 Oct 15;86(8):1557-66. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991015)86:8<1557::aid-cncr24>3.0.co;2-2.
3
The importance of adequate follow-up in defining treatment success after external beam irradiation for prostate cancer.充分随访在确定前列腺癌外照射治疗后治疗成功方面的重要性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Oct 1;45(3):553-61. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00235-7.
4
The correlation of serial prostate specific antigen measurements with clinical outcome after external beam radiation therapy of patients for prostate carcinoma.前列腺癌患者体外照射放疗后,前列腺特异性抗原系列测量值与临床结局的相关性。
Cancer. 2000 May 15;88(10):2305-18. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000515)88:10<2305::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-3.
5
Practical application of biochemical failure definitions: what to do and when to do it.生化失败定义的实际应用:做什么以及何时做。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jun 1;53(2):304-15. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02707-4.
6
The correlation between the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure and clinical outcome for patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation. American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.外照射治疗的前列腺癌患者中,美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)共识小组对生化失败的定义与临床结局之间的相关性。美国放射肿瘤学会。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 May 1;41(2):267-72. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00078-9.
7
Unification of a common biochemical failure definition for prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation.针对接受近距离放射治疗或外照射放疗(无论是否联合雄激素剥夺治疗)的前列腺癌,统一常见生化失败定义。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Dec 1;66(5):1430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.024. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
8
An analysis of clinical and treatment related prognostic factors on outcome using biochemical control as an end-point in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation.以外照射治疗前列腺癌患者生化控制为终点,对临床及治疗相关预后因素对结局的分析。
Radiother Oncol. 1997 Sep;44(3):223-8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00126-6.
9
Comparison of alternative biochemical failure definitions based on clinical outcome in 4839 prostate cancer patients treated by external beam radiotherapy between 1986 and 1995.1986年至1995年间接受外照射放疗的4839例前列腺癌患者中,基于临床结局的替代生化失败定义的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 15;57(4):929-43. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00631-x.
10
Serum prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prognostic implications.临床局限性前列腺癌放疗后的血清前列腺特异性抗原:预后意义
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Sep 30;30(2):279-87. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90005-1.

引用本文的文献

1
- .- .
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Nov 29;33(7):1661-1670. doi: 10.1007/s10068-023-01471-2. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Quality characteristics of soybean fermented by , , and from .来自[具体产地]的[发酵剂名称1]、[发酵剂名称2]和[发酵剂名称3]发酵大豆的品质特性 。 你提供的原文中部分内容缺失,我按照完整的翻译思路进行了翻译,你可根据实际情况补充完整信息。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 27;9(3):e14092. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14092. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Bacterial Community of Galchi-Baechu Kimchi Based on Culture-Dependent and - Independent Investigation and Selection of Starter Candidates.
基于培养依赖和非依赖方法的调查和出发菌株选择的甘茨白菜泡菜细菌群落。
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 28;32(3):341-347. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2112.12003.
4
Radiation for prostate cancer: use of biochemical failure as an endpoint following radiotherapy.前列腺癌的放射治疗:放疗后将生化复发用作终点指标
World J Urol. 2003 Sep;21(4):253-64. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0361-0. Epub 2003 Aug 16.