Suppr超能文献

“阶段考核”:基于全科医疗的会诊技能与综合知识评估。

"Phase examination" an assessment of consultation skills and integrative knowledge based in general practice.

作者信息

Foldevi M, Svedin C G

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Med Educ. 1996 Sep;30(5):326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00842.x.

Abstract

The undergraduate medical curriculum at Linköping was changed and problem-based learning introduced in 1986. As a consequence the need for new examinations arose. To assess the students' consultation skills, ability to use theory in practice and skills in problem-based learning, a new examination called 'phase examination' was designed and introduced. The examination results of a 4-year student cohort are presented here, including descriptive statistics and correlations between phase examinations 1 and 2, as well as a semester examination consisting of modified essay questions and an objective structured clinical examination. The construct validity of the phase examination was tested by factor analysis. In general, low correlation between the three examinations were found, and interpreted as a result of inter-case and inter-rater variability. The factor analysis identified two factors in both phase examinations--one representing the solving of a learning task, the other consultation skills. The variables concerning the use of knowledge had an intermediate position, more connected to the solving factor in phase 1 and the consultation factor in phase 2. With the close connection of theory and practice in the phase examination, both by its design and the pairing of examiners (one general practitioner and one basic scientist), these examinations can be an important learning experience for both students and teachers. The deficiencies in the reliability of the phase examinations is, in our view, compensated by its directing and supporting effect on students' learning and its face and construct validity.

摘要

林雪平大学的本科医学课程于1986年进行了改革,并引入了基于问题的学习方式。因此,需要进行新的考试。为了评估学生的咨询技巧、将理论应用于实践的能力以及基于问题的学习技巧,设计并引入了一种名为“阶段考试”的新考试。本文展示了一个四年级学生群体的考试结果,包括描述性统计数据以及阶段考试1和阶段考试2之间的相关性,还有一场由改进的论述题和客观结构化临床考试组成的学期考试。通过因子分析对阶段考试的结构效度进行了测试。总体而言,发现这三项考试之间的相关性较低,并将其解释为病例间和评分者间变异性的结果。因子分析在两次阶段考试中都识别出了两个因子——一个代表学习任务的解决,另一个代表咨询技巧。与知识运用相关的变量处于中间位置,在阶段1中与解决因子联系更紧密,在阶段2中与咨询因子联系更紧密。通过阶段考试在设计上以及考官配对(一名全科医生和一名基础科学家)上实现的理论与实践的紧密结合,这些考试对于学生和教师而言都可以是一次重要的学习经历。我们认为,阶段考试在可靠性方面的不足因其对学生学习的指导和支持作用以及表面效度和结构效度而得到了弥补。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验