Clark R H, Dykes F D, Bachman T E, Ashurst J T
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1058-61.
The association between high-frequency ventilation (HFV) and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) has been debated.
To determine if premature neonates treated with HFV are at greater risk for developing IVH and/or PVL than neonates treated with conventional ventilation, we completed a meta-analysis of all prospective randomized control trials comparing HFV and conventional ventilation in the management of respiratory distress syndrome.
The meta-analysis included nine studies comparing HFV and conventional ventilation in the management of preterm neonates. To summarize the data, we calculated the difference in absolute risk for IVH and PVL between neonates treated with HFV and those treated with standard ventilation. These differences were combined to determine an overall difference in the absolute risk and its confidence interval. We examined the effect of estimated gestational age, birth weight, surfactant, and age at study entry on the results. Because one trial (HIFI study) was much larger than the other studies, it dominated the analysis, so we evaluated the data with and without including data from the HIFI trial.
The occurrences of IVH and PVL ranged from 14% to 47% and 5% to 16%, respectively. This variation may be explained by the difference in the populations of neonates treated. The meta-analysis showed that use of HFV was associated with an increased risk of PVL (odds ratio = 1.7 with a confidence interval of 1.06 to 2.74), but not IVH or severe (> or = grade 3) IVH. When the results of the HIFI study were excluded, there were no differences between HFV and conventional ventilation in the occurrence of IVH or PVL.
The association between HFV and adverse neurologic outcomes is primarily influenced by the results of the HIFI trial. Meta-analysis of more recent studies does not confirm the findings of the HIFI trial and suggests that HFV is not associated with increased occurrence of IVH or PVL.
高频通气(HFV)与脑室内出血(IVH)及脑室周围白质软化(PVL)之间的关联一直存在争议。
为了确定接受高频通气治疗的早产儿发生IVH和/或PVL的风险是否高于接受传统通气治疗的新生儿,我们对所有比较HFV和传统通气治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的前瞻性随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。
该荟萃分析纳入了9项比较HFV和传统通气治疗早产儿的研究。为总结数据,我们计算了接受HFV治疗的新生儿与接受标准通气治疗的新生儿发生IVH和PVL的绝对风险差异。将这些差异合并以确定绝对风险的总体差异及其置信区间。我们研究了估计胎龄、出生体重、表面活性剂和研究入组时的年龄对结果的影响。由于一项试验(HIFI研究)比其他研究规模大得多,它主导了分析,因此我们在纳入和不纳入HIFI试验数据的情况下评估了数据。
IVH和PVL的发生率分别为14%至47%和5%至16%。这种差异可能由所治疗新生儿群体的差异来解释。荟萃分析表明,使用HFV与PVL风险增加相关(优势比=1.7,置信区间为1.06至2.74),但与IVH或重度(≥3级)IVH无关。排除HIFI研究的结果后,HFV和传统通气在IVH或PVL的发生率上没有差异。
HFV与不良神经学结局之间的关联主要受HIFI试验结果的影响。对近期研究的荟萃分析未证实HIFI试验的结果,并表明HFV与IVH或PVL发生率增加无关。