Mitchell-DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Marrin M, Goeree R, Willan A, Southwell D, Hewson S, Paes B, Rosenbaum P, Hunsberger M, Baumann A
School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1143-8.
To compare a clinical nurse specialist/neonatal practitioner (CNS/NP) team with a pediatric resident team in the delivery of neonatal intensive care.
Randomized, controlled trial.
A 33-bed tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit.
Of 821 infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit between September 1991 and September 1992, 414 were randomized to care by the CNS/NP team, and 407 were randomized to care by the pediatric resident team.
Infants assigned to the CNS/NPs team were cared for by CNS/NPs during the day and by pediatric residents during the night. Infants assigned to the pediatric resident team were cared for by pediatric residents around the clock. Neonatologists supervised both teams.
Outcome measures included mortality; number of neonatal complications; length of stay; quality of care, as assessed by a quantitative indicator condition approach; parent satisfaction with care, measured using the Neonatal Index of Parent Satisfaction; long-term outcomes, measured using the Minnesota Infant Development Inventory; and costs.
There were 19 (4.6%) deaths in the CNS/NP group and 24 (5.9%) in the resident group (relative risk [RR], 0.78; confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 1.40). In the CNS/NP group, 230 (55.6%) neonates had complications, in comparison with 220 (54.1%) in the resident group (RR, 1.03; CI 0.91 to 1.16). Mean lengths of stay were 12.5 days in the CNS/NP group and 11.7 days in the resident group (difference in means, 0.8 days; CI, -1.1 to 2.7). The performance on the indicator conditions was comparable in the two groups except for two instances, jaundice and charting, both of which favored the CNS/NP group. Mean scores on the Neonatal Index of Parent Satisfaction were 140 in the CNS/NP group and 139 in the resident group (difference in means, 1.0; CI, -3.6 to 5.6). In the CNS/NP group, 6 (2.6%) infants performed 30% or more below their age level in the Minnesota Infant Development Inventory, in comparison with 2 (0.9%) in the resident group (RR, 2.87; CI, 0.59 to 14.06) The cost per infant in the CNS/NP group was $14,245 and in the resident group $13,267 (difference in means, $978; CI, -1303.18 to 3259.05).
CNS/NP and resident teams are similar with respect to all tested measures of performance. These results support the use of CNS/NPs as an alternative to pediatric residents in delivering care to critically ill neonates.
比较临床护理专家/新生儿专科医生(CNS/NP)团队与儿科住院医师团队在新生儿重症监护方面的表现。
随机对照试验。
一家拥有33张床位的三级新生儿重症监护病房。
在1991年9月至1992年9月期间入住新生儿重症监护病房的821名婴儿中,414名被随机分配至CNS/NP团队护理,407名被随机分配至儿科住院医师团队护理。
分配至CNS/NP团队的婴儿白天由CNS/NP护理,夜间由儿科住院医师护理。分配至儿科住院医师团队的婴儿由儿科住院医师全天候护理。新生儿科医生对两个团队进行监督。
结果指标包括死亡率;新生儿并发症数量;住院时间;通过定量指标状况法评估的护理质量;家长对护理的满意度(使用家长满意度新生儿指数进行测量);长期预后(使用明尼苏达婴儿发育量表进行测量);以及成本。
CNS/NP组有19例(4.6%)死亡,住院医师组有24例(5.9%)死亡(相对危险度[RR],0.78;置信区间[CI],0.43至1.40)。CNS/NP组有230例(55.6%)新生儿出现并发症,住院医师组为220例(54.1%)(RR,1.03;CI 0.91至1.16)。CNS/NP组的平均住院时间为12.5天,住院医师组为11.7天(平均差值,0.8天;CI,-1.1至2.7)。除黄疸和病历记录这两个情况有利于CNS/NP组外,两组在指标状况方面的表现相当。家长满意度新生儿指数的平均得分在CNS/NP组为140分,住院医师组为139分(平均差值,1.0;CI,-3.6至5.6)。在CNS/NP组,6例(2.6%)婴儿在明尼苏达婴儿发育量表中的表现比其年龄水平低30%或更多,住院医师组为2例(0.9%)(RR,2.87;CI,0.59至14.06)。CNS/NP组每名婴儿的成本为14,245美元,住院医师组为13,267美元(平均差值,978美元;CI,-1303.18至3259.05)。
CNS/NP团队和住院医师团队在所有测试的表现指标方面相似。这些结果支持在为危重新生儿提供护理时,使用CNS/NP替代儿科住院医师。