Stafford R S, Singer D E
General Internal Medicine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(22):2537-41.
Despite consensus that patients with atrial fibrillation benefit from warfarin sodium anticoagulation, little is known about national trends and predictors of anticoagulant use.
We analyzed 1062 visits by patients with atrial fibrillation to randomly selected office-based physicians included in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys in 1980, 1981, 1985, and 1989 through 1993. Warfarin and aspirin use in these patients was extrapolated to national patterns and logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors.
Patients with atrial fibrillation made an estimated 1.3 (1980) to 3.1 (1992) million annual visits to physicians. Warfarin use in atrial fibrillation increased from 7% in 1980 and 1981 to 32% in 1992 and 1993 (P < .001 for trend). In 1992 and 1993, patients 80 years or older were significantly less likely to be taking warfarin (19%) compared with younger patients (36%), but showed similar rates of increase from 1980 and 1981 to 1992 and 1993. In 1992 and 1993, anticoagulation therapy was significantly more likely to be reported in visits to cardiologists (32%) and general internists (40%) compared with general and family practitioners (15%), but was similar in women (34%) and men (30%). Residents of the South (16%) had significantly lower rates of warfarin use than those in other regions of the United States (36%). Aspirin use increased from 3% to 10% (P = .001 for trend) and showed little overlap with warfarin use. Multiple logistic regression indicated that more recent year, residence outside the South, patient aged 65 to 74 years, and visits to cardiologists and internists increased the likelihood of warfarin use.
Anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation has increased dramatically. The substantial increase from 1989 and 1990 to 1992 and 1993 coincided with the publication of several randomized clinical trials reporting the benefits of warfarin. Although it is unrealistic to expect universal warfarin use, the 1992 and 1993 rate of 32% is probably suboptimal given the benefit of anticoagulation in preventing embolic strokes. The oldest patients, in whom warfarin may have its greatest benefit, appear to have the lowest rates of anticoagulant use.
尽管人们一致认为心房颤动患者可从华法林钠抗凝治疗中获益,但对于抗凝药物使用的全国趋势和预测因素却知之甚少。
我们分析了1980年、1981年、1985年以及1989年至1993年期间,心房颤动患者到随机抽取的参与国家门诊医疗调查的基层医生处就诊的1062次诊疗情况。将这些患者使用华法林和阿司匹林的情况外推至全国模式,并采用逻辑回归分析来确定独立预测因素。
心房颤动患者每年估计就诊130万次(1980年)至310万次(1992年)。心房颤动患者使用华法林的比例从1980年和1981年的7%增至1992年和1993年的32%(趋势P<0.001)。1992年和1993年,80岁及以上患者服用华法林的可能性(19%)显著低于年轻患者(36%),但从1980年和1981年至1992年和1993年的增长率相似。1992年和1993年,与普通科和家庭科医生(15%)相比,房颤患者就诊于心脏病专家(32%)和普通内科医生(40%)时,更有可能接受抗凝治疗,但女性(34%)和男性(30%)的情况相似。美国南部居民(16%)使用华法林的比例显著低于美国其他地区(36%)。阿司匹林的使用比例从3%增至10%(趋势P = 0.001),且与华法林的使用情况几乎没有重叠。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,年份更近、居住在美国南部以外地区、年龄在65至74岁之间以及就诊于心脏病专家和内科医生,会增加使用华法林的可能性。
心房颤动的抗凝治疗使用显著增加。1989年和1990年至1992年和1993年的大幅增长与多项报告华法林益处的随机临床试验的发表时间一致。尽管期望普遍使用华法林不现实,但鉴于抗凝治疗在预防栓塞性卒中方面的益处,1992年和1993年32%的使用率可能并非最佳。年龄最大的患者可能从华法林中获益最大,但他们的抗凝药物使用率似乎最低。