Suppr超能文献

下达“不要复苏”医嘱时是否总是必须获得同意?

Must consent always be obtained for a do-not-resuscitate order?

作者信息

Layson R T, McConnell T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(22):2617-20.

PMID:8951306
Abstract

Using cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac or respiratory arrest unless there is an explicit do-not-resuscitate order is a policy adopted by all hospitals. Such a policy usually requires the patient's (or surrogate's) consent for a do-not-resuscitate order to be instituted. This article, however, presents the argument that consent need not always be obtained. In the case discussed, the well-being of the patient, other patients, and the health care providers all support a unilateral decision by the physician not to attempt resuscitation at the time of death. The medical community and society need to acknowledge that such cases exist and to develop policies that respect not only the interests of patients but also those of health care providers and society.

摘要

除非有明确的不进行心肺复苏医嘱,否则对心脏骤停或呼吸骤停患者实施心肺复苏是所有医院都采用的一项政策。这样一项政策通常要求患者(或代理人)同意才能下达不进行心肺复苏的医嘱。然而,本文提出了一种观点,即不一定总是需要获得同意。在所讨论的案例中,患者、其他患者以及医护人员的福祉都支持医生在患者死亡时做出不尝试复苏的单方面决定。医学界和社会需要承认存在此类情况,并制定不仅尊重患者利益,而且尊重医护人员和社会利益的政策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验