• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠超声检查对前列腺癌筛查的诊断准确性

[Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography for screening of prostatic cancer].

作者信息

Watanabe M, Saitoh M, Watanabe H

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine.

出版信息

Hinyokika Kiyo. 1996 Oct;42(10):763-6.

PMID:8951472
Abstract

Between January, 1994 and December, 1995, we performed systematic biopsy of the prostate in a secondary study of our mass screening program for prostatic diseases. Of the 3,219 males over 55 years of age, 25 patients with prostatic cancer (11 in stage B, 10 in stage C and 4 in stage D) were detected. Herein, the diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography (TRS) was compared with that of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE). The sensitivity of TRS, PSA and DRE for cancer were 80%, 84% and 64% respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of TRS for cancer were higher than those of PSA or DRE.

摘要

在1994年1月至1995年12月期间,我们在前列腺疾病大规模筛查项目的二次研究中对前列腺进行了系统活检。在3219名55岁以上的男性中,检测出25例前列腺癌患者(B期11例,C期10例,D期4例)。在此,比较了经直肠超声检查(TRS)与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和直肠指诊(DRE)的诊断准确性。TRS、PSA和DRE对癌症的敏感性分别为80%、84%和64%。TRS对癌症的特异性、阳性预测值和准确性高于PSA或DRE。

相似文献

1
[Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography for screening of prostatic cancer].经直肠超声检查对前列腺癌筛查的诊断准确性
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1996 Oct;42(10):763-6.
2
[Clinical utility of available diagnostic tests in prostatic carcinoma. Results of 500 biopsies. II. Rectal palpation, PSA, and transrectal echography].[现有前列腺癌诊断检查的临床效用。500例活检结果。II.直肠指诊、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及经直肠超声检查]
Arch Esp Urol. 1997 May;50(4):339-45.
3
[Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen].[两种前列腺癌筛查技术的比较。直肠指诊和经直肠超声检查与前列腺特异性抗原]
Radiol Med. 1994 Oct;88(4):453-7.
4
The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density.筛查试验在前列腺癌检测中的价值。第二部分:游离/总前列腺特异性抗原分析比值、年龄特异性参考范围及前列腺特异性抗原密度的回顾性分析
Urology. 1995 Dec;46(6):779-84. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80343-4.
5
Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: a meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic korean men.前列腺特异性抗原、直肠指检和经直肠超声检查:对有症状的韩国男性前列腺癌诊断三联征的荟萃分析
Yonsei Med J. 2005 Jun 30;46(3):414-24. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.3.414.
6
Diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.前列腺癌的诊断:血清前列腺特异性抗原、直肠指检及经直肠超声检查的比较
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1997 Mar;20(1):23-8.
7
The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part I: Results of a retrospective evaluation of 1726 men.筛查试验在前列腺癌检测中的价值。第一部分:对1726名男性的回顾性评估结果
Urology. 1995 Dec;46(6):773-8. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80342-2.
8
Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening.通过基于前列腺特异性抗原的筛查,器官局限性前列腺癌的检出率有所提高。
JAMA. 1993 Aug 25;270(8):948-54.
9
Comparison between digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal ultrasound in symptomatic patients. Results on 141 cases.有症状患者中直肠指检、前列腺特异性抗原与经直肠超声检查的比较。141例患者的结果。
Eur Urol. 1992;21 Suppl 1:87-91. doi: 10.1159/000474899.
10
[Screening test for prostate cancer].[前列腺癌筛查试验]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1994 Sep;21(12):1923-7.