• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小主动脉瓣环行主动脉瓣置换术,伴或不伴瓣环扩大。

Aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus with or without annular enlargement.

作者信息

Kitamura M, Satoh M, Hachida M, Endo M, Hashimoto A, Koyanagi H

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Nov;5 Suppl 3:S289-93.

PMID:8953456
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY

Surgical treatments for aortic valve disease in the presence of a small aortic annulus need appropriate indications for operative procedures and precise selection of valve prostheses. The objective of this study was to compare long term results after aortic annular enlargement with those after operation using a small valve prosthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 1980, 45 patients with small aortic annulus underwent operation at our institution. There were six men and 39 women, and their ages ranged from 16 to 69 with a mean of 45.6 years. Of these patients, 28 underwent aortic annular enlargements (Nicks' procedure in 13, Manouguian's in 12 and apico-aortic bypass in three patients) and 17 patients received standard aortic valve replacement with a small valve prosthesis (19 mm Standard St. Jude Medical). Mean follow up was 8.6 years in the enlargement group and 4.9 years in the standard group.

RESULTS

Early mortality was 3.6% (1/28) in the enlargement group and 5.9% (1/17) in the standard group (NS). The 10-year actuarial survival including all deaths was 85.7% in the enlargement group and 62.7% in the standard group (p < 0.10). The rate of freedom from reoperation at 10 years was 90.7% in the enlargement group and 93.8% in the standard group (NS). The 10-year freedom from all valve-related events was 81.0% in the enlargement group and 58.8% in the standard group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The above results suggest that long term mortality and morbidity after aortic annular enlargement might be superior to those after standard AVR with a small valve prosthesis.

摘要

研究背景与目的

对于主动脉瓣环较小的主动脉瓣疾病患者,手术治疗需要为手术操作选择合适的指征,并精确挑选瓣膜假体。本研究的目的是比较主动脉瓣环扩大术后与使用小瓣膜假体手术后的长期结果。

材料与方法

自1980年以来,我院对45例主动脉瓣环较小的患者进行了手术。其中男性6例,女性39例,年龄在16至69岁之间,平均年龄为45.6岁。这些患者中,28例行主动脉瓣环扩大术(13例采用尼克斯手术,12例采用马努吉安手术,3例采用心尖 - 主动脉旁路术),17例接受标准主动脉瓣置换术,使用小瓣膜假体(19mm标准圣犹达医疗瓣膜)。扩大术组平均随访8.6年,标准组平均随访4.9年。

结果

扩大术组早期死亡率为3.6%(1/28),标准组为5.9%(1/17)(无统计学差异)。包括所有死亡病例在内,扩大术组10年精算生存率为85.7%,标准组为62.7%(p < 0.10)。扩大术组10年再次手术率为90.7%,标准组为93.8%(无统计学差异)。扩大术组10年无所有瓣膜相关事件发生率为81.0%,标准组为58.8%(p < 0.05)。

结论

上述结果表明,主动脉瓣环扩大术后的长期死亡率和发病率可能优于使用小瓣膜假体的标准主动脉瓣置换术。

相似文献

1
Aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus with or without annular enlargement.小主动脉瓣环行主动脉瓣置换术,伴或不伴瓣环扩大。
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Nov;5 Suppl 3:S289-93.
2
Eleven-year follow-up study of aortic or aortic-mitral anulus-enlarging procedure by Manouguian's technique.采用马努吉安技术对主动脉或主动脉-二尖瓣环扩大术进行的11年随访研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Nov;104(5):1259-63.
3
Concomitant procedures in the small versus standard aortic root.小主动脉根部与标准主动脉根部的同期手术
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Nov;5 Suppl 3:S294-301.
4
Midterm results of Manouguian double valve replacement: comparison with standard double valve replacement.马努吉安双瓣膜置换术的中期结果:与标准双瓣膜置换术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Apr;129(4):869-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.026.
5
Evolution of aortic valve replacement in children: a single center experience.儿童主动脉瓣置换术的进展:单中心经验
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 10;113(2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.11.011. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
6
Decision-making in the choice of heart valve for replacement in patients aged 60-70 years: twenty-year follow up of the St. Jude Medical aortic valve prosthesis.60至70岁患者心脏瓣膜置换选择中的决策制定:圣犹达医疗主动脉瓣膜假体的20年随访
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11 Suppl 1:S37-44.
7
Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.生物主动脉瓣假体与机械主动脉瓣假体的比较?倾向评分匹配人群的19年比较。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Jul;14(4):493-500.
8
Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.圣犹达医疗Silzone机械瓣膜假体的七年随访结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 May;137(5):1109-15.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.070.
9
Stentless aortic valve replacement with the biocor prosthesis: indications and outcome.使用生物心脏瓣膜假体进行无支架主动脉瓣置换术:适应症与结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Nov;5 Suppl 3:S314-6.
10
Long-term clinical outcome with small size Standard St Jude Medical valves implanted in the aortic position.植入主动脉位置的小型圣犹达医疗标准瓣膜的长期临床结果。
J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 Sep;3(5):531-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Aortic root widening: "pro et contra".主动脉根部增宽:“支持与反对”
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;38(Suppl 1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-01125-6. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
Aortic Annulus Enlargement: Early and Long-Terms Results.主动脉瓣环扩大:早期和长期结果
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Mar 15;5(1):23-26. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.006. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Usefulness of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in evaluating aortic root diameters during a cardiac cycle.实时三维超声心动图在评估心动周期中主动脉根部直径方面的实用性。
J Echocardiogr. 2012 Mar;10(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s12574-011-0104-y. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
Small prosthesis size in aortic valve replacement does not affect mortality.小口径人工主动脉瓣置换不影响死亡率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):880-8; discussion 888. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.105.
5
Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves for a small calcified aortic annulus in elderly patients.采用17毫米圣犹达医疗Regent人工瓣膜为老年患者钙化小主动脉瓣环进行主动脉瓣置换术。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Oct;58(10):506-10. doi: 10.1007/s11748-010-0629-4. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
6
Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography.通过静息和多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图评估17毫米圣犹达医疗Regent人工主动脉心脏瓣膜。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Sep 19;1:27. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-1-27.