Thompson D A, Yarnold P R, Adams S L, Spacone A B
Emergency Department, MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, Illinois, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Dec;28(6):652-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70089-6.
To assess the ability of patients to accurately estimate specific waiting times in the emergency department.
A questionnaire was administered by telephone to a random sample of 776 patients (or parents or responsible caretakers, if appropriate) who had been treated within the previous 2 to 4 weeks in the ED of a suburban hospital. Respondents were asked their perceptions of two particular time frames: (1) the time elapsed from triage until initial examination by the emergency physician (physician waiting time [PWT]), and (2) the time elapsed from triage until departure from the ED (total waiting time [TWT]). Corresponding actual times were extracted from a computerized database. Time frames were divided into discrete periods for comparison. The correspondence between actual and perceived times was assessed by optimal data analysis.
Only 22.3% of the respondents accurately estimated PWT. Although this level of accuracy is statistically significant (P < .0001), it reflects only 11% of the theoretically possible improvement in accuracy beyond chance. More respondents overestimated than underestimated PWT (49.9% versus 27.8%, respectively). In contrast, TWT was accurately estimated by 36.6% of the respondents (P < .0001), reflecting 18% of the theoretically possible improvement in accuracy beyond chance. Fewer respondents overestimated than underestimated TWT (24.5% versus 38.9%, respectively).
Patients are not very accurate in their estimation of actual waiting times. Although fewer than one fourth of the respondents overestimated the TWT spent in the ED, almost half the respondents overestimated the PWT.
评估患者准确估计急诊科特定等待时间的能力。
通过电话对776名患者(或家长或负责的看护人,视情况而定)进行问卷调查,这些患者在过去2至4周内在一家郊区医院的急诊科接受过治疗。受访者被问及他们对两个特定时间段的看法:(1)从分诊到急诊医生初次检查所经过的时间(医生等待时间[PWT]),以及(2)从分诊到离开急诊科所经过的时间(总等待时间[TWT])。相应的实际时间从计算机数据库中提取。时间段被划分为离散的时期进行比较。通过最优数据分析评估实际时间与感知时间之间的对应关系。
只有22.3%的受访者准确估计了PWT。尽管这种准确程度在统计学上具有显著意义(P <.0001),但它仅反映了理论上可能的准确性提高中超出偶然因素的11%。高估PWT的受访者多于低估PWT的受访者(分别为49.9%和27.8%)。相比之下,36.6%的受访者准确估计了TWT(P <.0001),反映了理论上可能的准确性提高中超出偶然因素的18%。高估TWT的受访者少于低估TWT的受访者(分别为24.5%和38.9%)。
患者对实际等待时间的估计不太准确。尽管不到四分之一的受访者高估了在急诊科花费的TWT,但几乎一半的受访者高估了PWT。