Utriainen T, Mäkimattila S, Virkamäki A, Lindholm H, Sovijärvi A, Yki-Järvinen H
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996 Dec;81(12):4258-63. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.12.8954024.
Insulin induces vasodilation via stimulation of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. This action of insulin exhibits considerable interindividual variation. We determined whether the response of blood flow to endothelium-dependent vasoactive agents correlates with that to insulin or whether other factors, such as physical fitness, limb muscularity, or vasodilatory capacity, better explain variations in insulin-stimulated blood flow. Direct measurements of the forearm blood flow response to three 2-h sequential doses of insulin (1, 2, and 5 mU/ kg.min), endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine) and endothelium-independent (sodium nitroprusside) vasoactive agents, and ischemia (reactive hyperemic forearm blood flow) were performed in 22 normal subjects (age, 24 +/- 1 yr; body mass index, 22.2 +/- 0.6 kg/m2; maximal aerobic power, 40 +/- 2 mL/kg.min). The highest insulin dose increased blood flow by 111 +/- 17%. The fraction of basal blood flow inhibited by NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (NO synthesis-dependent flow) varied from 6-47%. Maximal aerobic power (r = 0.52; P < 0.02), the percentage of forearm muscle (r = 0.50; P < 0.02), and the NO synthesis-dependent flow (r = 0.42; P < 0.05), but not reactive hyperemic, acetylcholine-stimulated, or sodium nitroprusside-stimulated flow, were significantly correlated with insulin-stimulated (5 mU/kg.min) blood flow. In multiple linear regression analysis, 52% of the variation (multiple R = 0.72; P < 0.001) in insulin-stimulated blood flow was explained by NO synthesis-dependent flow (P < 0.005) and the percentage of forearm muscle (P < 0.005). We conclude that endothelial function (NO synthesis-dependent basal blood flow) and forearm muscularity are independent determinants of insulin-stimulated blood flow.
胰岛素通过刺激一氧化氮(NO)合成来诱导血管舒张。胰岛素的这一作用存在显著的个体间差异。我们确定了血流对内皮依赖性血管活性药物的反应是否与对胰岛素的反应相关,或者其他因素,如体能、肢体肌肉量或血管舒张能力,是否能更好地解释胰岛素刺激血流的变化。对22名正常受试者(年龄,24±1岁;体重指数,22.2±0.6kg/m²;最大有氧功率,40±2mL/kg·min)进行了直接测量,测量前臂血流对三个2小时连续剂量胰岛素(1、2和5mU/kg·min)、内皮依赖性(乙酰胆碱和N-单甲基-L-精氨酸)和内皮非依赖性(硝普钠)血管活性药物以及缺血(反应性充血性前臂血流)的反应。最高剂量的胰岛素使血流增加了111±17%。N-单甲基-L-精氨酸抑制的基础血流分数(NO合成依赖性血流)在6%-47%之间变化。最大有氧功率(r=0.52;P<0.02)、前臂肌肉百分比(r=0.50;P<0.02)和NO合成依赖性血流(r=0.42;P<0.05),而非反应性充血、乙酰胆碱刺激或硝普钠刺激的血流,与胰岛素刺激(5mU/kg·min)的血流显著相关。在多元线性回归分析中,胰岛素刺激血流变化的52%(复相关系数R=0.72;P<0.001)可由NO合成依赖性血流(P<0.005)和前臂肌肉百分比(P<0.005)解释。我们得出结论,内皮功能(NO合成依赖性基础血流)和前臂肌肉量是胰岛素刺激血流的独立决定因素。