St Clair Gibson A, Lambert M I, Milligan J, van der Merwe W, Walters J, Noakes T D
Department of Physiology, University of Cape Town.
S Afr Med J. 1996 Oct;86(10):1281-4.
To assess views on use, maintenance and side-effects of the pneumatic tourniquet in the South African orthopaedic community.
A census-type questionnaire study was conducted of all 475 orthopaedic surgeons registered with the Orthopaedic Association of South Africa during 1993/94. The chi-square test was used to determine statistical significance between different groups of respondents.
Seventy-seven per cent of the questionnaires were returned. Ninety-nine per cent of respondents used a pneumatic tourniquet. Eighty-four per cent believed that the tourniquet may damage underlying tissue both as a result of applied pressure effects and ischaemic consequences. Fifty-four per cent of respondents personally checked the calibration of the pneumatic tourniquet, although 76% of respondents believe that the apparatus needs to be checked at least once per month. More respondents who did not check the tourniquet apparatus than respondents who did check it believe that applied pressure does not cause tissue damage (P < 0.001), that the operating room technician or hospital engineer should be responsible for checking equipment (P < 0.001), and that equipment did not need to be checked more than once every 6 months (P < 0.001).
Although most orthopaedic surgeons are aware of the pneumatic tourniquet's side-effects, a minority appear to be unaware of the hazards of excessive applied pressure alone or excessive applied pressure caused by use of faulty equipment. It needs to be emphasised to these surgeons that regular checking of the pneumatic tourniquet apparatus is necessary in order to prevent postoperative complications ascribed to use of the tourniquet.
评估南非骨科界对气动止血带的使用、维护及副作用的看法。
对1993/94年期间在南非骨科协会注册的所有475名骨科外科医生进行了普查式问卷调查研究。采用卡方检验确定不同受访者群体之间的统计学显著性。
77%的问卷被收回。99%的受访者使用气动止血带。84%的受访者认为止血带可能因施加的压力影响和缺血后果而损害深层组织。54%的受访者亲自检查气动止血带的校准情况,尽管76%的受访者认为该设备至少每月需要检查一次。未检查止血带设备的受访者比检查过的受访者更倾向于认为施加的压力不会导致组织损伤(P < 0.001),手术室技术人员或医院工程师应负责检查设备(P < 0.001),且设备不需要每6个月检查超过一次(P < 0.001)。
尽管大多数骨科外科医生都意识到气动止血带的副作用,但少数人似乎没有意识到仅施加过大压力或使用有故障设备导致的过大压力所带来的危害。需要向这些外科医生强调,定期检查气动止血带设备对于预防因使用止血带引起的术后并发症是必要的。