Kukar M, Kononenko I, Silvester T
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, Slovenia. (matjaz.kukar.igor.kononenko)@.fer.uni-lj.si
Artif Intell Med. 1996 Oct;8(5):431-51. doi: 10.1016/S0933-3657(96)00351-X.
We compare the performance of several machine learning algorithms in the problem of prognostics of the femoral neck fracture recovery: the K-nearest neighbours algorithm, the semi-naive Bayesian classifier, backpropagation with weight elimination learning of the multilayered neural networks, the LFC (lookahead feature construction) algorithm, and the Assistant-I and Assistant-R algorithms for top down induction of decision trees using information gain and RELIEFF as search heuristics, respectively. We compare the prognostic accuracy and the explanation ability of different classifiers. Among the different algorithms the semi-naive Bayesian classifier and Assistant-R seem to be the most appropriate. We analyze the combination of decisions of several classifiers for solving prediction problems and show that the combined classifier improves both performance and the explanation ability.
K近邻算法、半朴素贝叶斯分类器、具有权重消除学习的多层神经网络反向传播算法、LFC(前瞻性特征构建)算法,以及分别使用信息增益和RELIEFF作为搜索启发式方法的用于自上而下归纳决策树的Assistant - I和Assistant - R算法。我们比较了不同分类器的预后准确性和解释能力。在不同算法中,半朴素贝叶斯分类器和Assistant - R似乎是最合适的。我们分析了几种分类器的决策组合以解决预测问题,并表明组合分类器提高了性能和解释能力。