Suppr超能文献

既往有溶栓治疗禁忌证的患者采用不同再灌注策略的结果:直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术与组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的比较。心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PAMI)研究组。

Outcome of different reperfusion strategies in patients with former contraindications to thrombolytic therapy: a comparison of primary angioplasty and tissue plasminogen activator. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Investigators.

作者信息

Stone G W, Grines C L, Browne K F, Marco J, Rothbaum D, O'Keefe J H, Hartzler G O, Overlie P, Donohue B, Chelliah N, Vlietstra R, Puchrowicz-Ochocki S, O'Neill W W

机构信息

El Camino Hospital, Cardiovascular Institute, Mountain View, CA 94040, USA.

出版信息

Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Dec;39(4):333-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199612)39:4<333::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO;2-E.

Abstract

High-risk patients have been excluded from most thrombolytic trials because of concern over hemorrhagic complications or lack of efficacy. However, based on several recent studies suggesting that patients with relative thrombolytic contraindications may also benefit from reperfusion, recommendations have been made to broadly expand the eligibility criteria for thrombolytic therapy, despite higher absolute complication rates. Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may be an attractive alternative for patients presenting at appropriately equipped hospitals who would otherwise remain at high risk after thrombolytic therapy. In the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial, 395 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) or primary PTCA. Conditions were present in 151 patients (38%) which formerly would have contraindicated thrombolytic therapy (age > 70 yr, symptom duration > 4 hr, or prior bypass surgery). In-hospital mortality was 4.3-fold higher in patients with former thrombolytic contraindications compared to lytic-eligible patients (8.6% vs. 2.0%, P = .002). Lytic-eligible patients treated with t-PA and PTCA had similar in-hospital mortality (1.7% vs. 2.4%, P = NS). In contrast, both in-hospital (2.9% vs. 13.2%, P = .025) and 6-mo mortality (2.9% vs. 15.7%, P = .009) were significantly reduced in patients with former thrombolytic contraindications treated by primary PTCA compared to t-PA. By logistic regression analysis, treatment by PTCA rather than t-PA was the strongest predictor of survival in patients with former thrombolytic contraindications. We conclude that patients with conditions formerly contraindicating thrombolytic therapy constitute a high-risk group with significant morbidity and mortality after lytic reperfusion. Our data suggest that patients with former contraindications to thrombolytic therapy may benefit by preferential management with primary PTCA without antecedent thrombolysis.

摘要

由于担心出血并发症或缺乏疗效,高危患者已被排除在大多数溶栓试验之外。然而,基于最近的几项研究表明,有相对溶栓禁忌症的患者也可能从再灌注中获益,尽管绝对并发症发生率较高,但仍建议广泛扩大溶栓治疗的入选标准。对于在配备适当设备的医院就诊的患者,若溶栓治疗后仍处于高危状态,原发性经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)可能是一种有吸引力的替代方案。在心肌梗死原发性血管成形术(PAMI)试验中,395例急性心肌梗死患者被随机分为接受组织纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA)或原发性PTCA治疗。151例患者(38%)存在以前会被视为溶栓治疗禁忌症的情况(年龄>70岁、症状持续时间>4小时或既往有搭桥手术史)。与符合溶栓条件的患者相比,既往有溶栓禁忌症的患者住院死亡率高出4.3倍(8.6%对2.0%,P = .002)。接受t-PA和PTCA治疗的符合溶栓条件的患者住院死亡率相似(1.7%对2.4%,P = 无显著差异)。相比之下,与t-PA治疗相比,原发性PTCA治疗的既往有溶栓禁忌症的患者住院死亡率(2.9%对13.2%,P = .025)和6个月死亡率(2.9%对15.7%,P = .009)均显著降低。通过逻辑回归分析,PTCA而非t-PA治疗是既往有溶栓禁忌症患者生存的最强预测因素。我们得出结论,以前有溶栓治疗禁忌症的患者构成了一个高危组,溶栓再灌注后有显著的发病率和死亡率。我们的数据表明,以前有溶栓治疗禁忌症的患者可能通过优先采用原发性PTCA而非先行溶栓治疗而获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验