• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸水制备的细胞学涂片和凝块切片检查:一项对比研究。

Examination of cytological smears and clot sections prepared from pleural fluids: a comparative study.

作者信息

Dhundee J, Cotter M, Gibbs A R

机构信息

Department of Histology and Cytology, Llandough Hospital Trust, Penarth, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 1996 Dec;7(6):406-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1996.tb00546.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2303.1996.tb00546.x
PMID:8958474
Abstract

Between January 1989 and May 1990, the Department of Cytology of Llandough Hospital examined 784 pleural fluid cytological preparations, 99 of which were also examined as paraffin wax sections of clots that had formed. To assess whether this practice yields worthwhile information, we reviewed the cytology and clot sections of 99 patients with pleural effusions and correlated the results with subsequent histology and review of clinical case notes. The specificities of each method separately and when combined was high: 92% clot section, 85% smear cytology and 85% combined. The sensitivity using clot section alone was 49%, smear cytology alone 46% and in combination, 54%. Analysis showed no significant difference between sensitivities. When pleural fluid clot formation occurs, we recommend the continued examination of clot sections, since it yields an increase in positive diagnoses, albeit not statistically significant.

摘要

1989年1月至1990年5月期间,兰德奥医院细胞学部门检查了784份胸水细胞学标本,其中99份标本还作为已形成凝块的石蜡切片进行了检查。为了评估这种做法是否能提供有价值的信息,我们回顾了99例胸腔积液患者的细胞学和凝块切片,并将结果与后续的组织学检查以及临床病例记录回顾进行了对比。单独使用每种方法以及联合使用时的特异性都很高:凝块切片为92%,涂片细胞学为85%,联合检查为85%。单独使用凝块切片的敏感性为49%,单独使用涂片细胞学为46%,联合使用时为54%。分析显示敏感性之间无显著差异。当胸水形成凝块时,我们建议继续检查凝块切片,因为它能增加阳性诊断率,尽管在统计学上不显著。

相似文献

1
Examination of cytological smears and clot sections prepared from pleural fluids: a comparative study.胸水制备的细胞学涂片和凝块切片检查:一项对比研究。
Cytopathology. 1996 Dec;7(6):406-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1996.tb00546.x.
2
[Evaluation of immunohistochemistry staining and cytologic diagnosis by using cell block sections prepared with effusion fluid cytology specimens].[应用积液细胞学标本制备的细胞块切片评估免疫组织化学染色及细胞学诊断]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;38(8):547-50.
3
[Clinical values of cytological evaluation of pleural and peritoneal fluids].[胸腔和腹腔积液的细胞学评估的临床价值]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1982 Oct;9(10):1716-20.
4
The role of liquid-based cytology and ancillary techniques in pleural and pericardic effusions: an institutional experience.液基细胞学及辅助技术在胸腔积液和心包积液中的作用:一项机构经验。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 Apr;123(4):258-66. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21518. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
5
Use of cytological preparations for the intraoperative diagnosis of stereotactically obtained brain biopsies: a 19-year experience and survey of neuropathologists.利用细胞学制剂对立体定向脑活检进行术中诊断:19年经验及对神经病理学家的调查
J Neurosurg. 1999 Sep;91(3):454-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0454.
6
The value of multiple fluid specimens in the cytological diagnosis of malignancy.多种体液标本在恶性肿瘤细胞学诊断中的价值
Mod Pathol. 1994 Aug;7(6):665-8.
7
[Experiments for increasing statement power of cytodiagnosis from cavitary effusions in malignant tumors. I. Modified methodical processing of cytological smears from effusions of the pleural cavity and ascites].[提高恶性肿瘤空洞性积液细胞诊断说服力的实验。I. 胸腔积液和腹水细胞学涂片的改良方法处理]
Radiobiol Radiother (Berl). 1975;16(4):473-81.
8
Diagnostic value of clot examination for malignant cells in serous effusions.凝块检查对浆液性积液中恶性细胞的诊断价值。
Cytopathology. 2009 Aug;20(4):231-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00577.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
9
Comparative Analysis of Modified Liquid-Based Cytology and CytoRich Red Preparation in Assessment of Serous Effusion for Cancer Diagnosis.改良液基细胞学与CytoRich Red制片法在浆液性积液癌症诊断评估中的对比分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jun 25;19(6):1571-1575. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.6.1571.
10
A comparative analysis of conventional cytopreparatory and liquid based cytological techniques (Sure Path) in evaluation of serous effusion fluids.常规细胞制备技术与液基细胞学技术(Sure Path)在浆液性积液评估中的对比分析
Diagn Cytopathol. 2016 Nov;44(11):874-879. doi: 10.1002/dc.23567. Epub 2016 Aug 22.