Partnerships to protect.
作者信息
VanderMeer D
出版信息
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Nov;104(11):1158-60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.961041158.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Partnerships to protect.建立合作关系以进行保护。
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Nov;104(11):1158-60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.961041158.
2
Pesticide toxicity, human subjects, and the Environmental Protection Agency's dilemma.农药毒性、人体研究与美国环境保护局的困境
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2000 Summer;16(2):427-58.
3
Globally asbestos-free automobiles.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 1999 Jul-Sep;5(3):242-3. doi: 10.1179/oeh.1999.5.3.242.
4
Industry trumps peer-reviewed science at US environment agency.
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7718):292-293. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05946-9.
5
Targeting Environmental Neurodevelopmental Risks to Protect Children.针对环境性神经发育风险以保护儿童。
Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2245.
6
Republicans' bills target science at US environment agency.
Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1167-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60621-3.
7
The limits of science: dioxin.科学的局限：二噁英
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Apr;37(2):170-1. doi: 10.1016/s0273-2300(02)00045-4.
8
Risk assessment. Agencies decry fuzzy science in bill.风险评估。各机构谴责法案中的模糊科学。
Science. 1995 Feb 24;267(5201):1089-90. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5201.1089-a.
9
EPA expands controversial 'transparency' plan.美国环境保护局扩大有争议的“透明度”计划。
Science. 2020 Mar 13;367(6483):1180. doi: 10.1126/science.367.6483.1180.
10
States Protecting the Public Interest in the Era of Trump.特朗普时代保护公众利益的各州。
Milbank Q. 2018 Mar;96(1):25-28. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12309.
Zotero 插件