Suppr超能文献

使用生物可降解吻合环的结直肠手术。

Colorectal surgery using a biofragmentable anastomotic ring.

作者信息

Wang S M, Lai I R, Liang J T, Chang K J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, ROC.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 1996 Oct;95(10):798-801.

PMID:8961679
Abstract

To compare the efficacy of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (Valtrac-BAR, Davis and Geck, Medical Device Division, Danbury, CT, USA) with conventional anastomotic techniques, 30 patients who underwent colorectal surgery from August 1993 to March 1995 were retrospectively studied. The use of the BAR was also compared with conventional techniques including hand-sewn sutures in 30 patients and an end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler in 24 patients. There were 17 men and 13 women in the BAR group with ages ranging from 37 to 80 years, 18 men and 12 women in the hand-sewn group with ages ranging from 41 to 82 years and 14 men and 10 women in the EEA group with ages ranging from 38 to 72 years. Surgical indications included: 25 colon cancers and five rectal cancers in the BAR group; 27 colon cancers and three rectal cancers in the hand-sewn group; and six colon cancers and 18 rectal cancers in the EEA group. There was no conversion to other anastomotic methods. Most of the patients tolerated a low-residual diet from the fifth post-operative day. No clinical leakage or stricture was noted. Only seven patients were aware of the passage of BAR fragments. The mean hospital stay was 14.1 days. There were no significant differences among these techniques in the return of bowel function, the incidence of surgical complications, including anastomotic leakage, or the length of hospitalization. BAR anastomosis was more time efficient than conventional techniques. Our results confirmed that BAR was an ideal sutureless alternative for anastomosis in colorectal surgery.

摘要

为比较生物可降解吻合环(美国康涅狄格州丹伯里市戴维斯和盖克医疗器械部的Valtrac - BAR)与传统吻合技术的疗效,对1993年8月至1995年3月期间接受结直肠手术的30例患者进行了回顾性研究。还将使用BAR的情况与传统技术进行了比较,其中包括30例采用手工缝合的患者以及24例采用端端吻合(EEA)吻合器的患者。BAR组有17名男性和13名女性,年龄在37至80岁之间;手工缝合组有18名男性和12名女性,年龄在41至82岁之间;EEA组有14名男性和10名女性,年龄在38至72岁之间。手术适应证包括:BAR组25例结肠癌和5例直肠癌;手工缝合组27例结肠癌和3例直肠癌;EEA组6例结肠癌和18例直肠癌。均未转为其他吻合方法。大多数患者术后第5天开始耐受低残留饮食。未发现临床渗漏或狭窄。仅7例患者察觉到BAR碎片排出。平均住院时间为14.1天。这些技术在肠功能恢复、手术并发症发生率(包括吻合口漏)或住院时间方面无显著差异。BAR吻合术比传统技术更节省时间。我们的结果证实,BAR是结直肠手术中理想的无缝合吻合替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验