Cummins D D
Psychology Department, California State University, Sacramento 95819, USA.
Mem Cognit. 1996 Nov;24(6):823-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03201105.
Deontic reasoning is reasoning about what one may, ought, or ought not do in a given set of circumstances. Virtually all of our social institutions and child-rearing practices presume the capacity to reason about deontic concepts, such as what is permitted, obligated, or prohibited. Despite this, very little is known about the development of deontic reasoning. Two experiments were conducted that contrasted children's reasoning performance on deontic and indicative reasoning tasks (i.e., the reduced array selection version of the Wason card selection task). Like adults, children as young as 3 years of age were found to adopt a violation-detecting strategy more often when reasoning about the deontic case than when reasoning about the indicative case. These results indicate that violation detection emerges as an effective deontic reasoning very early in human development.
道义推理是关于在给定的一系列情况下一个人可以、应该或不应该做什么的推理。实际上,我们所有的社会制度和育儿实践都假定人们有能力对道义概念进行推理,比如什么是被允许的、有义务的或被禁止的。尽管如此,我们对道义推理的发展却知之甚少。我们进行了两项实验,对比了儿童在道义推理任务和指示性推理任务(即华生卡片选择任务的简化阵列选择版本)中的推理表现。和成年人一样,我们发现年仅3岁的儿童在进行道义推理时比进行指示性推理时更频繁地采用违规检测策略。这些结果表明,违规检测在人类发展的早期就作为一种有效的道义推理出现了。