Suppr超能文献

临床试验:治疗方式之间相关性的意义

Clinical trials: relevance of correlation between treatment modalities.

作者信息

Cleophas T J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Merwede Hospital Dordrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Dec;33(12):670-5.

PMID:8963485
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trials that do not allow rejection of the null hypothesis of no treatment effect may have had an inappropriate design. Trials are virtually never assessed for correlation between responses to different treatment modalities.

METHODS

Using a model, a simple test and several published studies we studied the influence of correlation levels on the statistical power of clinical trials.

RESULTS

The level of correlation between treatment modalities is a major determinant of the power of both self-controlled and parallel group clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

It is extremely relevant to assess correlation levels between treatment modalities of a trial a priori. With a presumably negative correlation a self-controlled design is likely to lack power. With a presumably positive correlation a parallel group design is likely to do so. Both designs are suitable for approximately zero correlations (e.g. comparison vs placebo).

摘要

背景

不允许拒绝无治疗效果的零假设的试验可能设计不当。实际上,从未对不同治疗方式的反应之间的相关性进行过试验评估。

方法

我们使用一个模型、一项简单测试以及几项已发表的研究,研究了相关性水平对临床试验统计效能的影响。

结果

治疗方式之间的相关性水平是自控和平行组临床试验效能的主要决定因素。

结论

事先评估试验治疗方式之间的相关性水平极为重要。如果可能存在负相关,自控设计可能缺乏效能。如果可能存在正相关,平行组设计可能缺乏效能。两种设计都适用于相关性近似为零的情况(例如与安慰剂比较)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验