• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测麻醉护理期间咪达唑仑与瑞芬太尼之间的相互作用。

Interactions between midazolam and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care.

作者信息

Avramov M N, Smith I, White P F

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 75235, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1283-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00000542-199612000-00009
PMID:8968175
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remifentanil, an ultra-short-acting opioid analgesic, may be useful as an intravenous adjuvant to local anesthesia for treating patient discomfort and pain during monitored anesthesia care (MAC). However, the remifentanil dose requirements, interactions with other commonly used sedative drugs (such as midazolam), and recovery characteristics after ambulatory procedures have not been determined. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remifentanil alone and in combination with different doses of midazolam during MAC.

METHODS

Eighty-one healthy consenting women scheduled for elective breast biopsy procedures were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups according to an institutional review board-approved, double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol. The study medication (containing either saline or 2 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg of midazolam) was administered intravenously 5 min before starting an infusion of remifentanil at 0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1. The remifentanil infusion was subsequently adjusted in 0.025- and 0.05-microgram.kg-1.min-1 increments to maintain patient comfort and adequate ventilation during the operation. The level of sedation was assessed at 1- to 10-min intervals during the procedure using the inverted observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale, with a score of 1 = awake, alert to 5 = asleep, unarousable. Discomfort and pain were assessed using numerical rating scales. Hemoglobin oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, mean), and heart rate were monitored at 1- to 5-min intervals. Intraoperative amnesia was assessed by asking patients to recall a picture shown 5 min after the study medication was administered. Recovery was evaluated using the Aldrete score and the times to "home readiness" and actual discharge. Side effects and patient satisfaction were assessed in a follow-up telephone interview on the first postoperative day.

RESULTS

Midazolam produced dose-dependent increases in the median level of sedation. Remifentanil produced a greater reduction in respiratory rate in the 4-mg and 8-mg midazolam groups. However, there were no significant differences in the hemodynamic variables or discharge times. Patients with OAA/S scores of 1 to 3 ("light" sedation) 5 min after the study medication experienced a greater incidence of intraoperative pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared with those with OAA/S scores of 4 to 5 ("deep" sedation). Discharge times were prolonged for patients in the light sedation group in whom PONV developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of remifentanil alone for MAC did not provide optimal sedation during local anesthesia. However, 0.05 to 0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1 remifentanil in combination with 2 mg midazolam given intravenously, provided effective sedation and analgesia during MAC in healthy patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists status 1 to 2. Midazolam also produced dose-dependent potentiation of remifentanil's depressant effect on respiratory rate. In outpatients receiving a combination of midazolam and remifentanil during local anesthesia, the level of sedation appears to influence the incidence of both intraoperative pruritus and PONV.

摘要

背景

瑞芬太尼是一种超短效阿片类镇痛药,作为局部麻醉的静脉辅助用药,可能有助于在麻醉监护(MAC)期间治疗患者的不适和疼痛。然而,瑞芬太尼的剂量需求、与其他常用镇静药物(如咪达唑仑)的相互作用以及门诊手术后的恢复特征尚未确定。因此,本研究旨在评估瑞芬太尼单独使用以及与不同剂量咪达唑仑联合使用在MAC期间的安全性和有效性。

方法

81名计划进行择期乳房活检手术且同意参与的健康女性,根据机构审查委员会批准的双盲、安慰剂对照方案,随机分配至四个治疗组之一。在以0.1微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹的速度开始输注瑞芬太尼前5分钟,静脉注射研究药物(含生理盐水或2毫克、4毫克或8毫克咪达唑仑)。随后以0.025微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹和0.05微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹的增量调整瑞芬太尼输注速度,以在手术期间维持患者舒适和充分通气。在手术过程中,每隔1至10分钟使用反向观察者警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)量表评估镇静水平,评分1 = 清醒、警觉至5 = 入睡、无法唤醒。使用数字评分量表评估不适和疼痛。每隔1至5分钟监测血红蛋白氧饱和度、呼吸频率、血压(收缩压、舒张压、平均压)和心率。通过询问患者回忆在研究药物给药后5分钟展示的图片来评估术中遗忘。使用Aldrete评分以及“准备回家”时间和实际出院时间评估恢复情况。在术后第一天通过电话随访评估副作用和患者满意度。

结果

咪达唑仑使镇静中位数水平呈剂量依赖性增加。瑞芬太尼在4毫克和8毫克咪达唑仑组中使呼吸频率降低幅度更大。然而,血流动力学变量和出院时间无显著差异。与OAA/S评分为4至5(“深度”镇静)的患者相比,研究药物给药后5分钟OAA/S评分为1至3(“轻度”镇静)的患者术中瘙痒和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率更高。发生PONV的轻度镇静组患者出院时间延长。

结论

单独使用瑞芬太尼用于MAC在局部麻醉期间未提供最佳镇静效果。然而,0.05至0.1微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹的瑞芬太尼与静脉注射2毫克咪达唑仑联合使用,在被分类为美国麻醉医师协会1至2级状态的健康患者的MAC期间提供了有效的镇静和镇痛。咪达唑仑还使瑞芬太尼对呼吸频率的抑制作用呈剂量依赖性增强。在局部麻醉期间接受咪达唑仑和瑞芬太尼联合治疗的门诊患者中,镇静水平似乎影响术中瘙痒和PONV的发生率。

相似文献

1
Interactions between midazolam and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care.监测麻醉护理期间咪达唑仑与瑞芬太尼之间的相互作用。
Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1283-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00009.
2
Use of alfentanil and propofol for outpatient monitored anesthesia care: determining the optimal dosing regimen.阿芬太尼与丙泊酚用于门诊监护麻醉:确定最佳给药方案。
Anesth Analg. 1997 Sep;85(3):566-72. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199709000-00015.
3
Comparison of the sedation and recovery profiles of Ro 48-6791, a new benzodiazepine, and midazolam in combination with meperidine for outpatient endoscopic procedures.新型苯二氮䓬类药物Ro 48-6791与咪达唑仑联合哌替啶用于门诊内镜检查的镇静及恢复情况比较。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):893-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00014.
4
Remifentanil versus remifentanil/midazolam for ambulatory surgery during monitored anesthesia care.瑞芬太尼与瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑用于监测麻醉护理下的门诊手术比较。
Anesthesiology. 1997 Jul;87(1):51-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00007.
5
Median effective dose of remifentanil for awake laryngoscopy and intubation.瑞芬太尼用于清醒喉镜检查和插管的半数有效剂量。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jul 5;122(13):1507-12.
6
A comparison of propofol and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care.监测麻醉护理期间丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 1997 Mar;9(2):148-54. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(96)00240-1.
7
Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial.瑞芬太尼与哌替啶用于结肠镜检查期间患者自控镇痛的随机双盲试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1119-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.53. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
8
The safety and effectiveness of remifentanil as an adjunct sedative for regional anesthesia.瑞芬太尼作为区域麻醉辅助镇静剂的安全性和有效性。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):134-40. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00025.
9
Remifentanil plus low-dose midazolam for outpatient sedation in transesophageal echocardiography.瑞芬太尼联合小剂量咪达唑仑用于门诊经食管超声心动图检查的镇静
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 21;136(3):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.05.034. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
10
Use of analgesics during propofol sedation: a comparison of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl.丙泊酚镇静期间镇痛药的使用:酮咯酸、地佐辛和芬太尼的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 1995 Sep;7(6):481-5. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00058-p.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block With Monitored Anesthesia Care for Necrotic Umbilical Hernia Repair in a Patient With Severe Liver Failure and Refractory Ascites: A Case Report.超声引导下腹直肌鞘阻滞联合监护麻醉用于严重肝功能衰竭合并难治性腹水患者坏死性脐疝修补术:一例报告
Cureus. 2025 Mar 11;17(3):e80433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80433. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Comparison of Anesthetics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Network Meta-Analysis.喉罩气道插入的麻醉比较:网络荟萃分析。
Anesth Prog. 2024 Jul 8;71(2):58-75. doi: 10.2344/22-00033.
3
Effective dose of remimazolam co-administered with remifentanil to facilitate I-gel insertion without neuromuscular blocking agents: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.
瑞马唑仑复合瑞芬太尼用于无肌松药下引导气管插管的半数有效剂量:上下序贯法分配试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02041-z.
4
Comparison of 2 effect-site concentrations of remifentanil with midazolam during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy under procedural analgesia and sedation: A randomized controlled study.在程序镇痛和镇静下经直肠超声引导前列腺活检中比较瑞芬太尼与咪达唑仑的 2 个效应部位浓度:一项随机对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30466. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030466.
5
Continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil improves the experience of parturient undergoing repeated cesarean section under epidural anesthesia, a prospective, randomized study.连续静脉输注瑞芬太尼可改善硬膜外麻醉下再次剖宫产产妇的体验:一项前瞻性、随机研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0900-x.
6
The clinical pharmacology of remifentanil: a brief review.瑞芬太尼的临床药理学:简要综述。
J Anesth. 1998 Dec;12(4):195-204. doi: 10.1007/BF02481730.
7
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new highly concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for conscious sedation.一种用于清醒镇静的新型高浓度鼻内咪达唑仑制剂的药代动力学和药效学
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;83(4):721-731. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13163. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
A Response Surface Model Exploration of Dosing Strategies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopies Using Midazolam and Opioids.使用咪达唑仑和阿片类药物的胃肠内镜检查给药策略的响应面模型探索
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(23):e3520. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003520.
9
Comparison between monitored anesthesia care with remifentanil under ilioinguinal hypogastric nerve block and spinal anesthesia for herniorrhaphy.髂腹股沟和髂腹下神经阻滞下瑞芬太尼监测麻醉与脊麻用于疝修补术的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 May;64(5):414-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.414. Epub 2013 May 24.
10
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery.不同剂量瑞芬太尼用于乳腺活检手术患者自控镇静时镇静质量、副作用和恢复特征的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Nov;63(5):431-5. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.5.431. Epub 2012 Nov 16.