Carlile S, Wardman D
Department of Physiology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Dec;100(6):3761-8. doi: 10.1121/1.417236.
An attempt has been made to relate the masking effects studied under dichotic listening conditions to masking seen in the free field. Rather than use a free-field masking paradigm combined with monaural and binaural listening conditions, broadband maskers presented in virtual auditory space (VAS) have been used. Two virtual locations were tested: One was the right interaural axis (+90 degrees from the anterior midline) and the other was 40 degrees right of the anterior midline. Narrow-band (critical bandwidth) dichotic and diotic maskers were also derived from the VAS masker by bandpass filtering around the test frequency. This procedure preserved the interaural differences within the critical band about the test frequency but removed information outside the critical band. Using a diotic target tone of 0.6 kHz with a narrow-band masker centered on 0.6 kHz there was an increase in signal detection in the dichotic conditions when compared to that attributable to either ear alone. Furthermore, there was no further advantage in signal detection at this target frequency when a broadband VAS masker was used. This suggests that for low-frequency targets, the binaural differences within the critical band about the target frequency are sufficient for effective unmasking. In contrast, for a target frequency of 4 kHz, a dichotic narrow-band masker resulted in a reduction in detection compared to that attributable to either ear. However, detection improved to the level attributable to the far ear when a broadband VAS masker was used. This suggests that information outside the critical band is involved in the unmasking of high-frequency targets.
人们尝试将在双耳分听条件下研究的掩蔽效应与自由场中的掩蔽现象联系起来。研究没有采用结合单耳和双耳聆听条件的自由场掩蔽范式,而是使用了在虚拟听觉空间(VAS)中呈现的宽带掩蔽声。测试了两个虚拟位置:一个是右耳间轴(从前正中线向右90度),另一个是从前正中线向右40度。窄带(临界带宽)双耳分听和双耳掩蔽声也是通过在测试频率周围进行带通滤波从VAS掩蔽声中导出的。该过程保留了测试频率周围临界带内的耳间差异,但去除了临界带外的信息。使用0.6kHz的双耳目标音,以0.6kHz为中心的窄带掩蔽声,与单耳聆听相比,双耳分听条件下的信号检测有所增加。此外,使用宽带VAS掩蔽声时,在该目标频率下信号检测没有进一步优势。这表明对于低频目标,目标频率周围临界带内的双耳差异足以实现有效的解掩蔽。相比之下,对于4kHz的目标频率,与单耳聆听相比,双耳窄带掩蔽声会导致检测率降低。然而,使用宽带VAS掩蔽声时,检测率提高到了较远耳的水平。这表明临界带外的信息参与了高频目标的解掩蔽。