Jackson R, Chambless L E, Yang K, Byrne T, Watson R, Folsom A, Shahar E, Kalsbeek W
Department of Community Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1441-46. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00047-x.
This study provides data on differences between respondents and nonrespondents by gender and ethnicity in a multicenter community-based study that is rarely collected and that may be useful for estimating bias in prevalence estimates in other studies. Demographic, general health, and cardiovascular risk factors were examined in black and white respondents and nonrespondents to the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, a prospective study investigating cardiovascular risk factors in approximately 16,000 adults that was initiated in 1986 in four U.S. communities. In one of the communities (Jackson, MS) black participants were recruited exclusively; in another (Forsyth County, NC) 12% of the eligible sample were black, whereas the samples in Washington County, MD and the northwestern suburbs of Minneapolis, MN were almost all white. Demographic and health characteristics were collected during a home interview. Subjects who subsequently agreed to complete a clinical examination were defined as respondents, while eligible participants who only took part in the home interview were considered to be nonrespondents. Approximately 75% of age-eligible individuals (45-64 years) in each community completed the home interview. In three of the communities 86-88% of those who took part in the home interview also completed the clinic examination, whereas only 65% did so in Jackson. Among white participants, response rates were similar in men and women and between communities. Among black participants, the response rates were considerably lower, particularly in men. White male respondents reported a higher socioeconomic status, better general health and a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors than white male nonrespondents. The difference between white respondents and nonrespondents were greater for men than women despite similar response rates. Among black participants, respondent/nonrespondent difference were usually of smaller magnitude or absent, particularly in women. General health status and recent hospitalization rates were almost identical in black respondents and nonrespondents. Low response rates can bias estimates of prevalence in community-based studies although differences between respondents and nonrespondents tend to exaggerate real differences between respondents and the eligible population sampled. For example, among white males 25% of respondents and 44% of nonrespondents were current smokers, yet the estimated community prevalence of smoking was 31%. In conclusion, difference observed between respondents and nonrespondents were in the expected direction, but were greater for men than women and for whites than blacks.
本研究提供了在一项多中心社区研究中按性别和种族划分的应答者与非应答者之间差异的数据,这类数据很少被收集,但可能有助于估计其他研究中患病率估计的偏差。在社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究的黑人和白人应答者与非应答者中,对人口统计学、总体健康状况和心血管危险因素进行了调查。ARIC研究是一项前瞻性研究,于1986年在美国四个社区启动,调查了约16000名成年人的心血管危险因素。在其中一个社区(密西西比州杰克逊市),仅招募黑人参与者;在另一个社区(北卡罗来纳州福赛斯县),符合条件的样本中有12%是黑人,而马里兰州华盛顿县和明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯西北郊区的样本几乎全是白人。人口统计学和健康特征在家庭访谈期间收集。随后同意完成临床检查的受试者被定义为应答者,而仅参加家庭访谈的符合条件的参与者被视为非应答者。每个社区中约75%符合年龄条件(45 - 64岁)的个体完成了家庭访谈。在其中三个社区中,参加家庭访谈的人中有86 - 88%也完成了临床检查,而在杰克逊市只有65%的人完成了临床检查。在白人参与者中,男性和女性以及不同社区之间的应答率相似。在黑人参与者中,应答率相当低,尤其是男性。白人男性应答者报告的社会经济地位更高、总体健康状况更好,心血管疾病及相关危险因素的患病率更低,高于白人男性非应答者。尽管应答率相似,但白人应答者和非应答者之间男性的差异大于女性。在黑人参与者中,应答者/非应答者之间的差异通常较小或不存在,尤其是在女性中。黑人应答者和非应答者的总体健康状况和近期住院率几乎相同。低应答率可能会使基于社区的研究中患病率的估计产生偏差,尽管应答者和非应答者之间的差异往往会夸大应答者与所抽样的符合条件人群之间的实际差异。例如,在白人男性中,25%的应答者和44%的非应答者是当前吸烟者,但估计的社区吸烟患病率为31%。总之,应答者和非应答者之间观察到的差异符合预期方向,但男性大于女性,白人大于黑人。