Worrall S F
Department of Oral/Maxillofacial and Head and Neck Surgery, North Staffordshire Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Dec;34(6):495-9. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(96)90243-0.
This paper reports the results of a postal survey of all current BAOMS Fellows concerning their practice and opinion on the usefulness and desirability of reviewing all patients following uncomplicated minor oral surgery. It also reports the results of a separate postal survey of 500 patients who had recently undergone third molar removal. The overwhelming majority of Fellows routinely review all their patients following third molar removal and apicectomy but not after simple exodontia. There was no excess morbidity in patients who were not offered a follow-up appointment compared to those who had been seen postoperatively after removal of their third molars. Patients not followed up in hospital postoperatively did not seek help from their doctor or dentist more frequently than patients who were followed-up. Despite the lack of evidence showing objective benefit to patients from postoperative follow-up, given the choice the majority of patients wish to be reviewed postoperatively.
本文报告了一项针对所有现任英国口腔颌面外科医师协会会员的邮寄调查结果,内容涉及他们对在简单的小型口腔手术后对所有患者进行复查的实用性和必要性的实践及看法。同时也报告了另一项针对500名近期接受了第三磨牙拔除术患者的邮寄调查结果。绝大多数会员在第三磨牙拔除术和根尖切除术后会常规复查所有患者,但在简单拔牙术后则不会。与术后接受复查的患者相比,未被安排随访预约的患者并未出现更多的发病情况。术后未在医院接受随访的患者,寻求医生或牙医帮助的频率并不高于接受随访的患者。尽管缺乏证据表明术后随访对患者有客观益处,但如果可以选择,大多数患者希望术后接受复查。