Witlin A G, Mercer B M, Sibai B M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, USA.
J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;5(6):355-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199611/12)5:6<355::AID-MFM12>3.0.CO;2-G.
The objective of this study was to review and characterize the presentation, diagnostic dilemmas, management, and prognosis of postpartum septic pelvic thrombophlebitis. Medical records of postpartum women with the diagnosis of septic pelvic thrombophlebitis were reviewed for the 8-year period 1986-1994. Cases of documented ovarian vein thrombosis or those with other pelvic pathology on imaging study were excluded. Thirty-one women, four following vaginal delivery and 27 following cesarean delivery, with a final diagnosis of septic pelvic thrombophlebitis were identified. All patients demonstrated refractory febrile morbidity (mean 5.5 +/- 1.9 days prior to instituting heparin therapy) despite multiagent antimicrobial therapy with ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin. Imaging studies (CT and/or ultrasound) were performed in 20 women and revealed no pelvic pathology. The patients required an average of 4.7 +/- 2.1 days (median 5, range 1-9 days) of heparin therapy before defervescence. Heparin levels were therapeutic at a mean of less than 24 h (range 6-24 h). The average dose of heparin required was 16.0 +/- 3.0 U/kg/h. Nine women had 13 subsequent pregnancies without recurrent thromboembolic complications. Currently available imaging studies cannot diagnose the entity we now define as septic pelvic thrombophlebitis (once cases of ovarian vein thrombosis are excluded). Our findings do not support the time-honored rule that septic pelvic thrombophlebitis responds within 24-48 h to therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin. Therefore, criteria other than imaging studies or immediate defervescence following heparin therapy are necessary for diagnosis of septic pelvic thrombophlebitis. A more appropriate terminology for septic pelvic thrombophlebitis should be refractory postpartum fever of undetermined etiology.
本研究的目的是回顾并描述产后感染性盆腔血栓性静脉炎的临床表现、诊断难题、治疗及预后。对1986年至1994年这8年间诊断为感染性盆腔血栓性静脉炎的产后女性的病历进行了回顾。排除了影像学检查记录有卵巢静脉血栓形成的病例或伴有其他盆腔病变的病例。确定了31例最终诊断为感染性盆腔血栓性静脉炎的女性,其中4例为阴道分娩后发病,27例为剖宫产术后发病。尽管使用氨苄西林、庆大霉素和克林霉素进行了多药联合抗菌治疗,但所有患者均表现出难治性发热(在开始肝素治疗前平均为5.5±1.9天)。对20名女性进行了影像学检查(CT和/或超声),未发现盆腔病变。患者平均需要4.7±2.1天(中位数为5天,范围为1至9天)的肝素治疗才能退热。肝素水平在平均不到24小时(范围为6至24小时)达到治疗水平。所需肝素的平均剂量为16.0±3.0 U/kg/h。9名女性随后有13次妊娠,无复发性血栓栓塞并发症。目前可用的影像学检查无法诊断我们现在定义为感染性盆腔血栓性静脉炎的疾病(一旦排除卵巢静脉血栓形成的病例)。我们的研究结果不支持长期以来的观点,即感染性盆腔血栓性静脉炎在24至48小时内对肝素治疗性抗凝有反应。因此,对于感染性盆腔血栓性静脉炎的诊断,除了影像学检查或肝素治疗后立即退热外还需要其他标准。感染性盆腔血栓性静脉炎更合适的术语应该是病因不明的难治性产后发热。