Björk T, Piironen T, Pettersson K, Lövgren T, Stenman U H, Oesterling J E, Abrahamsson P A, Lilja H
Department of Urology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Urology. 1996 Dec;48(6):882-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00486-4.
To compare different forms and ratios of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to determine which form or ratio provides optimal diagnostic specificity and sensitivity in distinguishing between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and clinically localized prostate cancer.
Serum samples were obtained from 47 patients with BPH and 39 with clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients with BPH underwent either transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Patients with prostate cancer, all of whom had no metastases on radionucleotide bone scans and no pelvic lymph node involvement, underwent either radical external beam radiation therapy or radical retropubic prostatectomy. All patients had pretreatment serum PSA levels between 1 and 20 ng/mL. The different forms of serum PSA (free PSA [PSA-F], PSA complexed to alpha 1-antichymotrypsin [PSA-ACT], and total PSA [PSA-T]) were measured using different monoclonal antibodies against PSA and ACT and immunofluorometric assay techniques. Furthermore, three ratios (PSA-F/PSA-T, PSA-ACT/PSA-T, and PSA-F/PSA-ACT) were calculated.
By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the performance of the different forms and ratios were compared. The PSA-F/PSA-T ratio had the greatest area under the curve (AUC, 0.776), significantly larger than that for PSA-T (0.612; P = 0.024). For PSA-ACT/PSA-T, the AUC was 0.695 (P = 0.283 versus PSA-T) and 0.773 for PSA-F/PSA-ACT (P = 0.051 versus PSA-T). At a cutoff level < 0.17, PSA-F/PSA-T had a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 66%, and a positive predictive value of 66% compared with 74%, 38%, and 50%, respectively, for PSA-T at a cutoff level > 4.0 ng/mL.
The PSA-F/PSA-T ratio gives the best diagnostic performance compared with that for other forms and ratios of PSA and will reduce the number of prostatic biopsies in patients with BPH.
比较血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的不同形式和比率,以确定哪种形式或比率在区分良性前列腺增生(BPH)和临床局限性前列腺癌时具有最佳的诊断特异性和敏感性。
采集了47例BPH患者和39例临床局限性前列腺癌患者的血清样本。BPH患者接受了经尿道前列腺切除术或经尿道微波热疗。前列腺癌患者,所有患者放射性核素骨扫描均无转移且无盆腔淋巴结受累,接受了根治性外照射放疗或根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术。所有患者治疗前血清PSA水平在1至20 ng/mL之间。使用针对PSA和α1 -抗糜蛋白酶(ACT)的不同单克隆抗体及免疫荧光测定技术测量血清PSA的不同形式(游离PSA [PSA - F]、与α1 -抗糜蛋白酶结合的PSA [PSA - ACT]和总PSA [PSA - T])。此外,计算了三个比率(PSA - F/PSA - T、PSA - ACT/PSA - T和PSA - F/PSA - ACT)。
通过受试者工作特征曲线分析,比较了不同形式和比率的性能。PSA - F/PSA - T比率的曲线下面积(AUC)最大(0.776),显著大于PSA - T的曲线下面积(0.612;P = 0.024)。对于PSA - ACT/PSA - T,AUC为0.695(与PSA - T相比,P = 0.283),对于PSA - F/PSA - ACT,AUC为0.773(与PSA - T相比,P = 0.051)。在临界值<0.17时,PSA - F/PSA - T的敏感性为79%,特异性为66%,阳性预测值为66%,而在临界值>4.0 ng/mL时,PSA - T的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值分别为74%、38%和50%。
与PSA的其他形式和比率相比,PSA - F/PSA - T比率具有最佳的诊断性能,并将减少BPH患者前列腺活检的数量。