Semjonow A, Oberpenning F, Brandt B, Zechel C, Brandau W, Hertle L
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany.
Urology. 1996 Dec;48(6A Suppl):10-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00604-8.
To determine why various assays for total PSA (t-PSA) produce discordant results in identical serum samples.
A total of 84 sera from 40 patients with histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia and from 44 patients with untreated prostate cancer were analyzed with seven assays for t-PSA and the Hybritech research assay for free prostate-specific antigen (f-PSA). Comparison between assays was performed by linear regression of the t-PSA concentrations as well as between the t-PSA concentrations and the f/t-PSA ratios.
The coefficients of correlation for the investigated assays versus Hybritech Tandem-E range from 0.96 to 0.99. Nevertheless average PSA concentrations differed significantly from the Tandem-E assay in all assays. Despite a good correlation, some assays showed a regression line with a slope notably different from 1. In these assays, elevated concentrations were observed in sera with a high proportion of f-PSA.
The study illustrates a significant and clinically relevant discordance between reported t-PSA concentrations for identical samples, depending on the assay used and on the contents of f-PSA in the sample. The interpretation of t-PSA concentrations requires awareness of the applied assay as well as the establishment of an assay-specific reference range in order to avoid inappropriate clinical consequences, such as unnecessary biopsies. Respective details must be contained in the laboratory reports. A change of assays without specifically reassessing previously valid reference ranges or the uncritical use of a customarily applied limit of < 4 ng/mL will otherwise be harmful to the patient.
确定为何针对总前列腺特异性抗原(t-PSA)的各种检测方法在相同血清样本中会产生不一致的结果。
对40例经组织学确诊为良性前列腺增生患者的84份血清以及44例未经治疗的前列腺癌患者的血清,采用7种t-PSA检测方法和Hybritech游离前列腺特异性抗原(f-PSA)研究检测法进行分析。通过t-PSA浓度的线性回归以及t-PSA浓度与f/t-PSA比值之间的比较来进行检测方法之间的对比。
所研究的检测方法与Hybritech Tandem-E检测法的相关系数在0.96至0.99之间。然而,所有检测方法中的平均PSA浓度与Tandem-E检测法均存在显著差异。尽管相关性良好,但一些检测方法显示回归线斜率明显不同于1。在这些检测方法中,f-PSA比例高的血清中观察到浓度升高。
该研究表明,对于相同样本,根据所使用的检测方法以及样本中f-PSA的含量,报告的t-PSA浓度之间存在显著且具有临床相关性的不一致。t-PSA浓度的解读需要了解所应用的检测方法以及建立特定检测方法的参考范围,以避免不适当的临床后果,如不必要的活检。实验室报告中必须包含相应细节。否则,在未专门重新评估先前有效的参考范围情况下更换检测方法,或不加批判地使用常规应用的<4 ng/mL限值,将对患者有害。