Lassmann-Vague V, Belicar P, Alessis C, Raccah D, Vialettes B, Vague P
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire Timone, Marseille, France.
Diabet Med. 1996 Dec;13(12):1051-5. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199612)13:12<1051::AID-DIA286>3.0.CO;2-Y.
Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) is a promising therapy of patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (IDDM), since it improves metabolic control and decreases frequency of severe hypoglycaemia. This could be due to more appropriate insulin kinetics. Our aim, therefore, was to compare plasma free insulin levels achieved in patients with Type 1 diabetes chronically treated with CSII or CIPII. Furthermore, as anti-insulin antibodies increase with this treatment, we wanted to assess their influence upon insulin kinetics. Plasma free insulin profiles were obtained during the night and then after the bolus for breakfast and the bolus for lunch in 11 patients with Type 1 diabetes treated successively by CSII and CIPII. In another group of 16 patients with long-term Type 1 diabetes, treated by CIPII, we examined the influence of anti-insulin antibody level on insulin kinetics after a bolus. During the night, plasma free insulin levels were lower with CIPII than with CSII (12:00 am: 10.1 +/- 1.7 vs 18.5 +/- 2.6 mU l-1; 4:00 am: 9.1 +/- 2 vs 15 +/- 3 mU l-1), p < 0.01. After the bolus, CIPII lead to an earlier (1h vs 3h) and higher (25.8 +/- 3.3 vs 18 +/- 2.7, p < 0.05) plasma free insulin peak than CSII. With CIPII, the return to baseline level was observed within 3 h. Conversely, during CSII, insulin levels did not return to baseline until the next meal. After the bolus, high insulin-antibody levels were associated with a reduced maximal value of plasma free insulin peak. Taken together, these findings suggest that CIPII provides plasma free insulin profiles which are much closer to physiology than CSII. This could explain the lower rate of severe hypoglycaemia observed with this type of treatment. But in long-term CIPII treated patients with high anti-insulin antibody level, insulin profile could be moderately modified. This emphasizes the need for a less immunogenic insulin preparation.
持续腹腔内胰岛素输注(CIPII)对于1型(胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病(IDDM)患者是一种很有前景的治疗方法,因为它能改善代谢控制并降低严重低血糖的发生频率。这可能归因于更合适的胰岛素动力学。因此,我们的目的是比较长期接受持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)或CIPII治疗的1型糖尿病患者的血浆游离胰岛素水平。此外,由于这种治疗会使抗胰岛素抗体增加,我们想评估它们对胰岛素动力学的影响。在11例先后接受CSII和CIPII治疗的1型糖尿病患者中,于夜间以及早餐和午餐推注胰岛素后获取血浆游离胰岛素曲线。在另一组16例接受CIPII治疗的长期1型糖尿病患者中,我们研究了推注胰岛素后抗胰岛素抗体水平对胰岛素动力学的影响。夜间,CIPII组的血浆游离胰岛素水平低于CSII组(凌晨12:00:10.1±1.7对18.5±2.6 mU l-1;凌晨4:00:9.1±2对15±3 mU l-1),p<0.01。推注后,CIPII导致血浆游离胰岛素峰值出现更早(1小时对3小时)且更高(25.8±3.3对18±2.7,p<0.05)。采用CIPII时,3小时内可观察到恢复至基线水平。相反,在CSII治疗期间,胰岛素水平直到下一餐才恢复至基线。推注后,高胰岛素抗体水平与血浆游离胰岛素峰值的最大值降低相关。综上所述,这些发现表明CIPII提供的血浆游离胰岛素曲线比CSII更接近生理状态。这可以解释这种治疗方式下严重低血糖发生率较低的原因。但在长期接受CIPII治疗且抗胰岛素抗体水平高的患者中,胰岛素曲线可能会受到适度影响。这强调了需要一种免疫原性较低的胰岛素制剂。