Nagelhus T A, Slupphaug G, Krokan H E, Lindmo T
Department of Physics, University of Trondheim, Norway.
Cytometry. 1996 Mar 1;23(3):187-95. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960301)23:3<187::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-G.
Quantitative analysis in confocal microscopy meets with several problems such as fading of the fluorophore during scanning and attenuation of the fluorescence in thick tissue specimens. The present study reports a quantitative investigation of the enzyme uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), which removes uracils from DNA. For this study we developed a fading correction algorithm which takes into account both the number of prior scans in the specimen, and the differences in fading through the specimen from each prior scan, presumably due to differences in laser intensity at various axial distances from the focus position. On this point, our findings are in contrast with results reported in other well known papers, and indicate different fading at various distances from the laser focus position. The correction procedure can and should be established for the same specimen, but on a different part of the specimen from that used in the actual biological study. Calibration can thus be done on an unknown or inhomogenous object. For a series of confocal xy-scans through the immunostained cells, a corrected summation image representing total FITC-fluorescence related to UDG was obtained. Both noise removal and fading corrections were performed on each image in the series before the summation image was made. Estimates of total amounts of UDG localized in the cells and nuclei, respectively, could then be obtained. Measurement of the total cellular UDG-content by flow cytometry was also performed in order to make a comparison of the two methods for quantitative analysis. For both methods a range of approximately 4.5 was obtained between total UDG-content of cells at the 5 and 95 percentage points.
共聚焦显微镜中的定量分析存在若干问题,如扫描过程中荧光团的褪色以及厚组织标本中荧光的衰减。本研究报告了对从DNA中去除尿嘧啶的尿嘧啶-DNA糖基化酶(UDG)的定量研究。在本研究中,我们开发了一种褪色校正算法,该算法既考虑了标本中先前扫描的次数,也考虑了每次先前扫描中整个标本褪色的差异,这可能是由于距焦点位置不同轴向距离处激光强度的差异所致。在这一点上,我们的研究结果与其他知名论文报道的结果相反,并表明在距激光焦点位置的不同距离处存在不同的褪色情况。校正程序可以且应该针对同一样本建立,但要在样本的不同部分进行,且该部分与实际生物学研究中使用的部分不同。因此,可以在未知或不均匀的物体上进行校准。对于通过免疫染色细胞的一系列共聚焦xy扫描,获得了一个校正后的求和图像,该图像表示与UDG相关的总FITC荧光。在制作求和图像之前,对该系列中的每个图像都进行了噪声去除和褪色校正。然后可以分别获得定位于细胞和细胞核中的UDG总量的估计值。为了比较这两种定量分析方法,还通过流式细胞术对细胞中UDG的总含量进行了测量。对于这两种方法,在细胞总UDG含量的第5和第95百分位数之间获得了约4.5的范围。