• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济高效的颈动脉手术:全面评估

Cost-efficient carotid surgery: a comprehensive evaluation.

作者信息

Ammar A D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1996 Dec;24(6):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70052-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70052-6
PMID:8976360
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine whether comprehensive cost-cutting strategies adversely affect the outcome in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

From December 1994 to December 1995, 237 consecutive patients undergoing 260 carotid endarterectomies were prospectively studied. The following variables were assessed: carotid arteriography, preoperative laboratory tests, electrocardiograms and chest x-ray films, use of carotid shunts during operation, use of pathology department, intensive care, oxygen therapy, telemetry, and hospital stay. In addition, complications were tabulated.

RESULTS

Previously, all variables evaluated were routinely ordered. Subsequent to initiating the cost-containment strategies, the following results were achieved: arteriography in 52 (22%) of 237 patients, preoperative complete blood cell count and SMA-7 in 161 (62%) of 260 cases, preoperative electrocardiograms in 185 (71%) of 260 cases, preoperative chest x-ray films in 190 (73%) of 260 cases, carotid shunts in 83 (32%) of 260 cases, disease in no cases (0%), intensive care in 29 (11%) of 260 cases, oxygen therapy in 34 (13%) of 260 cases, telemetry in 17 (7%) of 260 cases, and hospital stay was decreased from an average of 2.6 to 1.3 days. Total savings based on average hospital and physician charges was $2.3 million. Complications included four strokes, one myocardial infarction, and no deaths. No patient required readmission. No recurrent or new neurologic or cardiac findings were identified clinically in follow-up at 1 and 4 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The results clearly demonstrate that comprehensive cost-cutting strategies can reduce charges significantly while maintaining patient safety.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定全面的成本削减策略是否会对接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者的治疗结果产生不利影响。

方法

对1994年12月至1995年12月期间连续接受260例颈动脉内膜切除术的237例患者进行前瞻性研究。评估了以下变量:颈动脉血管造影、术前实验室检查、心电图和胸部X光片、手术期间颈动脉分流管的使用、病理科的使用、重症监护、氧疗、遥测以及住院时间。此外,还列出了并发症情况。

结果

此前,所有评估变量均按常规进行检查。在启动成本控制策略后,取得了以下结果:237例患者中有52例(22%)进行了血管造影,260例病例中有161例(62%)进行了术前全血细胞计数和血清酶谱分析,260例病例中有185例(71%)进行了术前心电图检查,260例病例中有190例(73%)进行了术前胸部X光片检查,260例病例中有83例(32%)使用了颈动脉分流管,无病例(0%)进行病理检查,260例病例中有29例(11%)接受了重症监护,260例病例中有34例(13%)接受了氧疗,260例病例中有17例(7%)进行了遥测,住院时间从平均2.6天降至1.3天。基于平均住院和医生收费计算,总共节省了230万美元。并发症包括4例中风、1例心肌梗死,无死亡病例。无患者需要再次入院。术后1周和4周的随访中,临床上未发现复发性或新的神经或心脏问题。

结论

结果清楚地表明,全面的成本削减策略可以在保持患者安全的同时显著降低费用。

相似文献

1
Cost-efficient carotid surgery: a comprehensive evaluation.经济高效的颈动脉手术:全面评估
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Dec;24(6):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70052-6.
2
Cost-effective carotid endarterectomy in community practice.社区医疗中具有成本效益的颈动脉内膜切除术
Ann Vasc Surg. 1995 Sep;9(5):423-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02143853.
3
Cost-effective carotid endarterectomy.
Am J Surg. 1995 May;169(5):516-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80208-6.
4
Intensive care is cost-effective in carotid endarterectomy.
Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jan;8(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(99)00081-2.
5
Do clinical pathways for major vascular surgery improve outcomes and reduce cost?主要血管手术的临床路径能否改善治疗效果并降低成本?
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Aug;26(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70177-0.
6
Short-stay carotid endarterectomy is safe and cost-effective.
Am J Surg. 1995 May;169(5):512-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80207-4.
7
Modifiable Factors Leading to Increased Length of Stay after Carotid Endarterectomy.导致颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间延长的可改变因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;39:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.126. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
8
Carotid stenting and endarterectomy: a clinical and cost comparison of revascularization strategies.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术:血管重建策略的临床与成本比较
Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1063-70. doi: 10.1161/hs0402.105304.
9
Decreasing carotid endarterectomy length of stay at a university hospital.缩短大学医院颈动脉内膜切除术的住院时间。
Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Apr;7(3):292-7. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00101-x.
10
Safe and cost-effective approach to carotid surgery.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997 Sep;14(3):164-9. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80186-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Surgery Resident Participation on the Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy.外科住院医师参与对颈动脉内膜切除术结果的影响。
Kans J Med. 2020 Jan 31;13:6-8. eCollection 2020.
2
Vascular surgery, ICU and HDU: a 14-year observational study.血管外科、重症监护病房和高依赖病房:一项为期14年的观察性研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 May;90(4):291-6. doi: 10.1308/003588408X241980.
3
[Early transfer from intensive care does not influence clinical results of carotid endarterectomy].
Chirurg. 2005 Oct;76(10):977-81. doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1040-z.