• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区医疗中具有成本效益的颈动脉内膜切除术

Cost-effective carotid endarterectomy in community practice.

作者信息

Gibbs B F, Guzzetta V J, Furmanski D

机构信息

Sharp Hospital System, San Diego, Calif., USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 1995 Sep;9(5):423-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02143853.

DOI:10.1007/BF02143853
PMID:8541189
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare hospital charges for carotid endarterectomy on a surgeon-specific basis. The cost of carotid endarterectomy is influenced by preoperative evaluation, operating time, use of the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and surgical results. Length of stay and average hospital charges for 18 doctors performing 344 carotid endarterectomies at three hospitals were analyzed. Outcome data were also reviewed. The results demonstrated a wide variation in hospital charges among surgeons. Surgeons using the most cost-effective measures achieved comparable or superior outcomes. In an era of managed care, severe cost constraints mandate that surgeons perform similar studies in their own communities so that cost-effective clinical pathways can be developed. With the use of appropriate guidelines, carotid endarterectomy can be performed at relatively low cost without sacrificing quality.

摘要

本研究的目的是在外科医生个体的基础上比较颈动脉内膜切除术的医院收费情况。颈动脉内膜切除术的费用受术前评估、手术时间、重症监护病房的使用、住院时间和手术结果的影响。分析了在三家医院为344例患者实施颈动脉内膜切除术的18位医生的住院时间和平均医院收费情况。还对结果数据进行了审查。结果表明,不同外科医生的医院收费存在很大差异。采用最具成本效益措施的外科医生取得了相当或更好的结果。在管理式医疗时代,严格的成本限制要求外科医生在自己所在社区开展类似研究,以便制定出具有成本效益的临床路径。通过使用适当的指导方针,在不牺牲质量的前提下,可以以相对较低的成本实施颈动脉内膜切除术。

相似文献

1
Cost-effective carotid endarterectomy in community practice.社区医疗中具有成本效益的颈动脉内膜切除术
Ann Vasc Surg. 1995 Sep;9(5):423-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02143853.
2
Cost-effective carotid endarterectomy.
Am J Surg. 1995 May;169(5):516-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80208-6.
3
Cost-efficient carotid surgery: a comprehensive evaluation.经济高效的颈动脉手术:全面评估
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Dec;24(6):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70052-6.
4
Current practice--routine use of shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Cost reduction and surgical training.当前的做法——颈动脉内膜切除术常规使用分流术。成本降低与手术培训。
Int Angiol. 2001 Sep;20(3):218-24.
5
Cost-effective carotid endarterectomy.具有成本效益的颈动脉内膜切除术。
Br J Surg. 2000 Mar;87(3):323-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01361.x.
6
Economic evaluation of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的经济学评价
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Sep;205(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
7
Carotid endarterectomy is more cost-effective than carotid artery stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术比颈动脉支架置入术更具成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.045. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: comparison with patient characteristics and outcomes in younger patients.
J Vasc Surg. 2000 May;31(5):927-35. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.106417.
9
An institutional approach to maintenance of excellent outcomes for carotid endarterectomy in a setting with moderate-to-low procedure volume.在手术量为中低水平的情况下,采用机构性方法维持颈动脉内膜切除术的优异疗效。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
10
Factors predicting prolonged length of stay after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间延长的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Sep;32(3):550-4. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.107759.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation and Predictors of Surgical Case Costs among Urologists.泌尿科医生手术病例成本的差异及预测因素
Urol Pract. 2017 Jul;4(4):277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
2
Risk factors for readmission and revision surgery following rotator cuff repair.肩袖修复术后再入院及翻修手术的危险因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Mar;466(3):608-13. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0116-8. Epub 2008 Feb 10.