Avgustinovich D F, Gorbach O V, Kudryavtseva N N
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Department of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Russia.
Physiol Behav. 1997 Jan;61(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00303-4.
The behavior of C57BL/6J male mice with experience of repeated victories (winners) or defeats (losers) in daily agonistic interactions, was examined in the plus-maze and partition tests. The latter procedure assesses the reactivity of mice to another conspecific in the neighboring compartment of a common cage, communicative behavior or level of sociability. The behavior of mice after 10 days (T10) and 20 days (T20) of agonistic confrontations, as well as in controls (5 days of individual housing) was analyzed. Significant differences were found between T10 and T20 losers and controls in both tests. In the partition test, a decrease in the number of approaches and total and average time spent near the partition was found in T10 and, more pronounced, in T20 losers. In the plus-maze, losers showed fewer open and total entries than controls. Moreover, rarely did they pass from one enclosed arm to another, and also showed a decreased number of 'peepings' from enclosed arms. Percentage of open time did not differ significantly in losers compared to controls. It is suggested that the level of losers' sociability, estimated as low by the partition test, can include anxiety as a component, which is confirmed, at least partly, by some parameters of the plus-maze test. There were no differences in the partition or plus-maze tests between T10 winners and controls. However, all parameters of partition behavior were significantly different between T20 winners and controls. In the plus-maze, similar to losers, T20 winners displayed fewer open arm entries, number of "peepings,' and passages than controls. It was concluded that parameters of the partition and plus-maze tests correlate in mice with the alternative experience of agonistic confrontations, positive or negative. A combination of these two tests may be used for estimation of developing anxiety in mice.
在十字迷宫和分隔试验中,研究了在日常对抗性互动中经历过反复胜利(胜利者)或失败(失败者)的C57BL/6J雄性小鼠的行为。后一种程序评估小鼠对共同笼子相邻隔室内另一只同种小鼠的反应性、交流行为或社交水平。分析了在对抗性对峙10天(T10)和20天(T20)后以及对照组(单独饲养5天)小鼠的行为。在两项试验中,T10和T20的失败者与对照组之间均发现了显著差异。在分隔试验中,T10以及更明显的T20失败者靠近分隔物的接近次数、总时间和平均时间均减少。在十字迷宫中,失败者进入开放臂和总臂的次数比对照组少。此外,它们很少从一个封闭臂进入另一个封闭臂,并从封闭臂“窥视”的次数也减少。与对照组相比,失败者的开放时间百分比没有显著差异。有人认为,通过分隔试验估计为低水平的失败者社交性可能包括焦虑成分,这至少在一定程度上得到了十字迷宫试验某些参数的证实。T10胜利者与对照组在分隔试验或十字迷宫试验中没有差异。然而,T20胜利者与对照组在分隔行为的所有参数上均有显著差异。在十字迷宫中,与失败者类似,T20胜利者进入开放臂的次数、“窥视”次数和通过次数均比对照组少。得出的结论是,分隔试验和十字迷宫试验的参数与小鼠对抗性对峙的正负不同经历相关。这两种试验的组合可用于评估小鼠焦虑的发展情况。