Klimesch W
University of Salzburg, Department of Physiological Psychology, Austria.
Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Nov;24(1-2):61-100. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00057-8.
This article tries to integrate results in memory research from divergent disciplines such as cognitive psychology, neuroanatomy, and neurophysiology. The integrating link is seen in more recent findings that provide strong arguments for the assumption that oscillations are a basic form of communication between cortical cell assemblies. It is assumed that synchronous oscillations of large cell assemblies--termed type 1 synchronization--reflect a resting state or possibly even a state of functional inhibition. On the other hand, during mental activity, when different neuronal networks may start to oscillate with different frequencies, each network may still oscillate synchronously (this is termed type 2 synchronization), but as a consequence, the large scale type 1 oscillation disappears. It is argued that these different types of synchronization can be observed in the scalp EEG by calculating event-related power changes within comparatively narrow but individually adjusted frequency bands. Experimental findings are discussed which support the hypothesis that short-term (episodic) memory demands lead to a synchronization (increase in band power) in the theta band, whereas long-term (semantic) memory demands lead to a task-specific desynchronization (decrease or suppression of power) in the upper alpha band. Based on these and other findings, a new memory model is proposed that is described on three levels: cognitive, anatomical and neurophysiological. It is suggested that short-term (episodic) memory processes are reflected by oscillations in an anterior limbic system, whereas long-term (semantic) memory processes are reflected by oscillations in a posterior-thalamic system. Oscillations in these frequency bands possibly provide the basis for encoding, accessing, and retrieving cortical codes that are stored in the form of widely distributed but intensely interconnected cell assemblies.
本文试图整合认知心理学、神经解剖学和神经生理学等不同学科在记忆研究方面的成果。整合的纽带在于最近的研究发现,这些发现为振荡是皮层细胞集合之间基本的通讯形式这一假设提供了有力论据。据推测,大型细胞集合的同步振荡——称为1型同步——反映了一种静息状态,甚至可能是一种功能抑制状态。另一方面,在精神活动期间,当不同的神经元网络可能开始以不同频率振荡时,每个网络可能仍会同步振荡(这称为2型同步),但结果是,大规模的1型振荡消失了。有人认为,通过计算相对较窄但经过个体调整的频段内的事件相关功率变化,可以在头皮脑电图中观察到这些不同类型的同步。文中讨论了实验结果,这些结果支持了以下假设:短期(情景)记忆需求会导致θ频段的同步(频段功率增加),而长期(语义)记忆需求会导致上α频段特定任务的去同步(功率降低或抑制)。基于这些及其他发现,提出了一种新的记忆模型,该模型从认知、解剖和神经生理三个层面进行描述。有人认为,短期(情景)记忆过程由前边缘系统的振荡反映,而长期(语义)记忆过程由后丘脑系统的振荡反映。这些频段的振荡可能为编码、访问和检索以广泛分布但紧密相连的细胞集合形式存储的皮层代码提供了基础。