Harris M G, Gee A, Kusumoto R, Lee H
School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1996 Nov;67(11):676-80.
The use of OTC artificial tears is becoming increasingly widespread. Unintentional contamination of artificial tear products potentiates a risk of developing bacterial keratitis or exacerbating an existing eye infection. Presently, no published study has investigated recovery from bacterial contamination of artificial tear products.
Four different over-the-counter (OTC) artificial tear products were contaminated with two types of bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa were analyzed for the survivability of the microorganisms at various times following contamination.
In this cross-sectional study, it was found that all the preserved brands showed a significant recovery rate from contamination compared to the preservative-free brand. After 9 hours, the preservative-free brand did not completely regain sterility after contamination with either bacteria.
This study indicates that preserved artificial tears recover from bacterial contamination at a significantly faster rate than preservative-free products. It is likely that the recovery from bacterial contamination is not solely attributed to the preservative, but that other variables may contribute.
非处方人工泪液的使用越来越广泛。人工泪液产品的意外污染增加了发生细菌性角膜炎或加重现有眼部感染的风险。目前,尚无已发表的研究调查人工泪液产品细菌污染后的恢复情况。
四种不同的非处方(OTC)人工泪液产品被两种细菌污染。对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌在污染后的不同时间的微生物生存能力进行了分析。
在这项横断面研究中,发现与无防腐剂品牌相比,所有含防腐剂的品牌从污染中恢复的比率都显著。9小时后,无防腐剂品牌在被任何一种细菌污染后都没有完全恢复无菌状态。
这项研究表明,含防腐剂的人工泪液从细菌污染中恢复的速度明显快于无防腐剂产品。细菌污染后的恢复可能不仅仅归因于防腐剂,其他变量也可能起作用。