Suppr超能文献

Randomized comparison of sitting and prone positions for stereotactic fine-needle aspiration breast biopsy.

作者信息

Helbich T H, Dantendorfer K, Mostbeck G H, Schick S, Wunderbaldinger P, Amering M, Alexandrowicz R, Wolf G

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1996 Sep;83(9):1252-5.

PMID:8983620
Abstract

In a prospective randomized study, 103 women had stereotactic biopsies performed either in the prone (n = 51) or sitting (n = 52) position. Questionnaires were administered before and after biopsy, to measure anxiety, pain and subjective experience in all patients. Vasovagal reactions were scored from 0 to 2 according to severity. There was no significant difference between biopsies performed in the sitting or the prone position with regard to overall tolerance. Significantly more patients biopsied in the prone position (15 of 51, 29 per cent) than in the sitting position (seven of 52, 13 per cent) would prefer premedication before a repeat biopsy (P = 0.04). Of the total patient group, three women fainted, one in the prone position and two others in the sitting position. Breast biopsies performed in the prone or sitting position are equally well tolerated. Somatic reactions such as fainting are not a major problem during breast biopsy; however, attention should be focused on patient care, including information given before the procedure.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验