Childers M K, Stacy M, Cooke D L, Stonnington H H
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Missouri-Columbia, 65212, USA.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Nov-Dec;75(6):462-9. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199611000-00013.
This study sought to test the hypothesis that injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) at the mid belly of the gastrocnemius muscle in spastic hemiplegic adults produce superior clinical results to proximal injections directed toward the muscular origin. We designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention study at a university tertiary care setting. Seventeen subjects with chronic spastic hemiplegic gait were enrolled from a volunteer community sample; time range from acute neurologic insult was 0.75 to 31 yr; age range was 19 to 71 yr; gender consisted of 11 men and 4 women; diagnoses were 12 patients with stroke, 2 with traumatic brain injuries, and 1 with a brain tumor. Two subjects were withdrawn from the study because of (1) acute vascular occlusion before intervention and (2) noncompliance with follow-up visits. After baseline measurements, subjects were injected with 50 units of BTX-A (volume, 0.5 cc) into the medial or lateral gastrocnemius: (1) proximally at one site near the muscular origin; (2) distally at three sites along the mid belly. We measured outcome using the Fugl-Meyer score, Ashworth scale, ankle range of motion, and a timed 50-ft fastest walk. No outcome measures showed a significant effect attributable to site of injections. Confounding variables included physical therapy and varying duration of illness in the study cohort. We conclude that the results failed to support the hypothesis that BTX-A injections at the mid belly of the gastrocnemius produced superior functional improvements to injections located near the muscular origin using localization techniques described. Additional research comparing more precise localization methods for BTX-A injections might further establish the importance of electromyographic guidance using BTX-A in management of spasticity.
对于痉挛性偏瘫成人,在腓肠肌中部注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX-A)比在靠近肌肉起点的近端注射能产生更优的临床效果。我们在一所大学三级医疗中心开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照干预研究。从志愿者社区样本中招募了17名患有慢性痉挛性偏瘫步态的受试者;急性神经损伤后的时间范围为0.75至31年;年龄范围为19至71岁;性别构成包括11名男性和4名女性;诊断结果为12例中风患者、2例创伤性脑损伤患者和1例脑肿瘤患者。两名受试者退出研究,原因分别是:(1)干预前急性血管闭塞;(2)未遵守随访安排。在进行基线测量后,受试者被注射50单位的BTX-A(体积为0.5 cc)至腓肠肌内侧或外侧:(1)在靠近肌肉起点的一个近端部位;(2)在沿中部的三个远端部位。我们使用Fugl-Meyer评分、Ashworth量表、踝关节活动范围和50英尺定时最快步行来测量结果。没有结果指标显示注射部位有显著影响。混杂变量包括物理治疗以及研究队列中疾病持续时间的差异。我们得出结论,结果未能支持以下假设:按照所描述的定位技术,在腓肠肌中部注射BTX-A比在靠近肌肉起点处注射能产生更优的功能改善。比较BTX-A注射更精确的定位方法的进一步研究,可能会进一步确定在痉挛管理中使用BTX-A时肌电图引导的重要性。