Tavoloni N, Inoue H
Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-6574, USA.
J Virol. 1997 Jan;71(1):237-47. doi: 10.1128/JVI.71.1.237-247.1997.
Primary cell cultures are in general resistant to the transforming effect of a single oncogene, a finding considered consistent with the multistage theory of carcinogenesis. In the present studies, we examined whether cellular age, differentiation stage, and/or tissue origin of primary cells plays a role in determining their response to v-src transformation. To study the role of cellular age, rat mammary fibroblasts were isolated from a 50-day-old female rat and infected with a recombinant retrovirus carrying a v-src gene after 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of continuous growth. To determine whether cellular differentiation is important, fibroblasts were isolated from embryos at 12 and 16 days of gestation, from newborns, and from a 30-day-old rat and similarly infected. Finally, the role of primary-cell histogenesis was assessed by infecting primary cultures of fibroblasts isolated from the mammary gland, dermis, and lungs of a mature rat. When compared to 3Y1 cells, all preparations of primary cultures exhibited considerable resistance to v-src transformation. However, whereas primary cells isolated from different tissues responded similarly to the transforming effect of the oncogene, major differences were observed when cells were transduced at different stages of their in vitro life span. v-src was capable of inducing formation of foci and growth in soft agar in early-passage cells but failed to do so in primary cultures infected after 14 days of continuous passaging. Similarly, both the number of foci and the number of colonies in soft agar decreased with tissue donor age. The differential response of young and senescing cells could not be explained by mutations in v-src provirus, by differences in functional v-src expression, or by growth stimulation or suppression via paracrine mechanisms. Furthermore, v-src cooperated with an immortalizing gene, like simian virus 40 large T, polyomavirus large T, E6 and E7 of human papillomavirus, or an activated p53 mutant, to induce anchorage-independent growth of primary cultures but failed to do so with cytoplasmic transforming genes, like v-abl, v-ras, or v-raf, which did not confer indefinite division potential. These studies indicate that cellular aging is a critical determinant of primary-cell resistance to v-src transformation. It is suggested that v-src requires a nuclear auxiliary function for transformation which is present in early-passage cells, particularly when these cells are derived from embryonic tissue, but is lost as cells approach replicative senescence. This auxiliary function is provided by nuclear oncogenes but not cytoplasmic transforming genes.
原代细胞培养物一般对单个癌基因的转化作用具有抗性,这一发现被认为与癌症发生的多阶段理论相一致。在本研究中,我们检测了原代细胞的细胞年龄、分化阶段和/或组织来源是否在决定其对v-src转化的反应中起作用。为了研究细胞年龄的作用,从一只50日龄雌性大鼠中分离出大鼠乳腺成纤维细胞,并在连续生长2、7、14、21和28天后,用携带v-src基因的重组逆转录病毒进行感染。为了确定细胞分化是否重要,从妊娠12天和16天的胚胎、新生大鼠以及30日龄大鼠中分离出成纤维细胞,并进行类似的感染。最后,通过感染从成熟大鼠的乳腺、真皮和肺中分离出的成纤维细胞原代培养物,评估原代细胞组织发生的作用。与3Y1细胞相比,所有原代培养物制剂对v-src转化均表现出相当大的抗性。然而,尽管从不同组织分离的原代细胞对癌基因的转化作用反应相似,但当在其体外寿命的不同阶段转导细胞时,观察到了主要差异。v-src能够在早期传代细胞中诱导集落形成和在软琼脂中生长,但在连续传代14天后感染的原代培养物中则不能。同样,软琼脂中的集落数量和克隆数量均随组织供体年龄的增加而减少。年轻细胞和衰老细胞的不同反应不能用v-src前病毒中的突变、功能性v-src表达的差异或旁分泌机制的生长刺激或抑制来解释。此外,v-src与一种永生化基因,如猿猴病毒40大T抗原、多瘤病毒大T抗原、人乳头瘤病毒的E6和E7,或活化的p53突变体协同作用,以诱导原代培养物的不依赖贴壁生长,但与细胞质转化基因,如v-abl、v-ras或v-raf则不能,这些基因不赋予无限分裂潜能。这些研究表明,细胞衰老主要决定原代细胞对v-src转化的抗性。有人提出,v-src转化需要一种核辅助功能,这种功能存在于早期传代细胞中,特别是当这些细胞来源于胚胎组织时,但随着细胞接近复制性衰老而丧失。这种辅助功能由核癌基因提供,而不是由细胞质转化基因提供。