Bhutta Z A
Department of Paediatrics, Aga Khan University Medical Center, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ann Trop Paediatr. 1996 Dec;16(4):299-306. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1996.11747842.
We evaluated the response to therapy in a series of 876 children consecutively admitted to The Aga Khan University Hospital with culture-proven typhoid, including 281 cases infected with multi-drug-resistant (MDR) strains. Among sensitive isolates there was no significant difference in cure rates, failure rates and time to defervescence with either ampicillin or chloramphenicol. Of the 217 children with MDR typhoid who received therapy with third-generation cephalosporins, the outcome was significantly better with intravenous ceftriaxone compared with cefotaxime. Despite comparable cure rates, the time to defervescence was significantly longer among MDR strains treated with ceftriaxone versus sensitive strains (mean (SD): 7.2 (3.4) versus 6.3 (29) days; p < 0.05). Earlier recognition and introduction of appropriate second-line therapy has allowed us to reduce the case fatality rates of typhoid to under 1%. Although a 14-day course of ceftriaxone can be used successfully to treat most children hospitalized with MDR typhoid, there is a need to evaluate the role of short-course therapy or alternative therapeutic agents.
我们对阿迦汗大学医院连续收治的876例经培养证实为伤寒的儿童的治疗反应进行了评估,其中包括281例感染多重耐药(MDR)菌株的病例。在敏感菌株中,氨苄西林或氯霉素的治愈率、失败率和退热时间没有显著差异。在217例接受第三代头孢菌素治疗的MDR伤寒儿童中,静脉注射头孢曲松的治疗效果明显优于头孢噻肟。尽管治愈率相当,但与敏感菌株相比,用头孢曲松治疗的MDR菌株退热时间明显更长(平均(标准差):7.2(3.4)天对6.3(2.9)天;p<0.05)。早期识别并采用适当的二线治疗使我们能够将伤寒的病死率降至1%以下。虽然14天疗程的头孢曲松可成功用于治疗大多数因MDR伤寒住院的儿童,但仍有必要评估短程治疗或替代治疗药物的作用。