Garcia-Cairasco N, Wakamatsu H, Oliveira J A, Gomes E L, Del Bel E A, Mello L E
Physiology Department, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Dec;26(1):177-92. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(96)00050-2.
Acute audiogenic seizures are a model of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, induced by high intensity acoustic stimulation in genetically susceptible rodents. The neural substrate are sensory motor brainstem nuclei. Recruitment of forebrain structures takes places upon repetition of acoustically evoked seizures. The term audiogenic kindling means forebrain kindling evoked by repeated brainstem seizures and has been described in several strains of genetically epilepsy-prone rats. Thus, the present work was conducted in order to test the hypothesis that audiogenic kindling recruits the forebrain, which may be behaviorally evaluated and associated with morphological changes as well. The behavioral sequences observed during the development of audiogenic kindling were assessed by neuroethological methods (cluster analysis), with the ETHOMATIC program. Seizure severity indexes (brainstem and limbic seizures) and latencies of wild running and tonic-clonic seizures were measured to quantify seizure evolution. Densitometric analysis of Neo-Timm staining was used for assessing morphological changes associated with audiogenic kindling. In group I, II resistant (R) and 16 susceptible (S) animals were stimulated (120 dB) 21 times, and allowed a 10 day recovery period prior to retesting. In group II, 22 R and 20 S were stimulated 60 times, and allowed a 2 month recovery period prior to retesting. Repetition of the acoustic stimulation in group I and group II susceptible animals led to a progressive and statistically significant attenuation of the behaviors associated with brainstem seizures and a concomitant increased expression of the behaviors associated with limbic seizures. After either a 10 day (group I) or 2 month (group II) recovery period, acoustic stimulation preferentially evoked brainstem-associated behaviors and seizures rather than limbic ones in the audiogenic susceptible animals, although in some animals overlapped brainstem and limbic seizures were detected. Latencies for the wild running and tonic seizures after acoustic stimulation significantly increased during audiogenic kindling for both group I and group II susceptible animals. The quantitative ethological evaluation in both group I and group II, illustrated by flowcharts, showed the evolution of the kindling installation by the presence of limbic seizure clusters, competing in time with the original tonic-clonic clusters. Expression of limbic seizures by group I animals, after acoustic stimulation, was not associated with changes in the mossy fiber Neo-Timm staining pattern of these animals. In group II however, Neo-Timm staining revealed mossy fiber sprouting in the ventral hippocampus (but not in the dorsal), and a significant change in the optical density of amygdaloid nuclei and perirhinal cortex in susceptible animals as compared to resistant ones. In conclusion, audiogenic kindling effectively recruits forebrain structures, responsible for the appearance of limbic seizures. It is possible that the paradigm used in group I was subthreshold for the development of clear-cut synaptic reorganization in the hippocampal mossy fiber system, since the behavioral patterns reverted ten days after the last seizure induction. In group II, however, an increased number of evoked seizures and a more prolonged time after the last chronic seizure showed structural re-arrangements in amygdala, perirhinal cortex and hippocampus, associated with permanence in terms of behavioral data (lack of regression of limbic seizures to control values).
急性听源性惊厥是一种全身性强直阵挛性惊厥模型,由高强度声音刺激在基因易感啮齿动物中诱发。其神经基质是感觉运动脑干核。在前脑结构在反复声诱发惊厥时会被激活。听源性点燃这一术语指的是由反复脑干惊厥诱发的前脑点燃,已在几种遗传性癫痫易感性大鼠品系中有所描述。因此,开展本研究是为了验证这一假说,即听源性点燃会激活前脑,这也可以通过行为学评估以及与形态学变化相关联来进行验证。在听源性点燃发展过程中观察到的行为序列通过神经行为学方法(聚类分析),使用ETHOMATIC程序进行评估。测量惊厥严重程度指标(脑干和边缘叶惊厥)以及狂奔和强直阵挛性惊厥的潜伏期以量化惊厥演变情况。采用对Neo-Timm染色进行光密度分析来评估与听源性点燃相关的形态学变化。在第一组中,16只易感(S)动物和12只抗性(R)动物接受21次(120分贝)刺激,并在重新测试前给予10天的恢复期。在第二组中,20只易感动物和22只抗性动物接受60次刺激,并在重新测试前给予2个月的恢复期。第一组和第二组易感动物重复声音刺激导致与脑干惊厥相关行为逐渐且具有统计学意义的减弱,同时与边缘叶惊厥相关行为的表达增加。在10天(第一组)或2个月(第二组)的恢复期后,声音刺激在听源性易感动物中优先诱发与脑干相关行为和惊厥,而非边缘叶相关行为,尽管在一些动物中检测到脑干和边缘叶惊厥重叠。第一组和第二组易感动物在听源性点燃过程中声音刺激后狂奔和强直惊厥潜伏期显著增加。第一组和第二组通过流程图所示的定量行为学评估显示点燃确立过程的演变,表现为边缘叶惊厥簇的出现,与原始强直阵挛簇在时间上相互竞争。第一组动物在声音刺激后边缘叶惊厥表达与这些动物苔藓纤维Neo-Timm染色模式的变化无关然而,在第二组中Neo-Timm染色显示易感动物腹侧海马体(而非背侧)出现苔藓纤维发芽,与抗性动物相比,杏仁核和嗅周皮质的光密度有显著变化。总之,听源性点燃有效地激活了前脑结构,导致边缘叶惊厥的出现。第一组所用的范式可能低于海马苔藓纤维系统清晰突触重组发展的阈值,因为行为模式在最后一次惊厥诱导后10天恢复原状。然而在第二组中,诱发惊厥数量增加以及最后一次慢性惊厥后更长的时间显示杏仁核、嗅周皮质和海马体有结构重排,在行为数据方面表现为持续性(边缘叶惊厥未回归到对照值)。