• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暗适应和明适应虎蝾螈视网膜中视杆和视锥水平细胞突触的反应敏感性和电压增益。

Response sensitivity and voltage gain of the rod- and cone-horizontal cell synapses in dark- and light-adapted tiger salamander retina.

作者信息

Yang X L, Wu S M

机构信息

Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3863-74. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3863.

DOI:10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3863
PMID:8985884
Abstract
  1. Rods, cones, and horizontal cells (HCs) were recorded in superfused, flat-mounted isolated retinas of the larval tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum, under dark- and light-adapted conditions. 2. Under dark-adapted conditions, HC responses to dim 500-nm light stimuli were mediated only by rods. In the linear voltage range (near the dark potentials), the average response to a light step of 0.5 s (500 nm, 0.438 photons per micron2 per s) was 0.41 +/- 0.06 (SD) mV for rods and 1.86 +/- 0.52 mV for HCs. The step sensitivity of rods was approximately 0.94 mV per photon micron2 s, or 0.032 mV per activated rhodopsin molecule (Rh*) rod second, and the step sensitivity of HCs was approximately 4.25 +/- 1.19 mV per photon micron2 s or 0.14 +/- 0.04 mV per Rh* rod second. The chord voltage gain of the rod-HC synapse had an average value of 4.54 and a range from 2.68 to 7.32. 3. By the use of the spectral subtraction method, we found that the average cone-mediated HC response to a 750-nm light step that elicited an average cone response of 0.73 +/- 0.20 mV was 1.15 +/- 0.31 mV. The step sensitivity of cones under dark-adapted conditions was 0.0012 mV per photon micron2 s, and that of the cone-mediated-HC response was 0.0019 mV per photon micron2 s. The chord voltage gains of the cone-HC synapses under dark-adapted conditions had an average value of 1.58 and a range from 0.82 to 2.05. 4. Under light-adapted conditions (with a 500-nm/-2.40 background light, which desensitized rod responses but did not substantially reduce the cone responses), the cones had an average response to a light step of 0.5 s (500 nm/-3.3) of 0.78 +/- 0.09 mV, and this response did not vary with time. The HC response to the same light step had an average value of 3.95 +/- 3.41 mV 3 min after the background light onset, and it increased with time until reaching a steady-state value of 5.95 +/- 3.63 mV approximately 15 min after the background light onset. The average chord voltage gain of the cone-HC synapse under such light-adapted conditions was 5.06 at 3 min after background light onset and 7.63 at 15 min after background light onset. These values are approximately 3-5 times higher than the chord voltage gain of the cone-HC synapse under dark-adapted conditions. 5. The background-induced increase of the chord voltage gain of the cone-HC synapse suggests that similarly to the rod-HC synapse, the voltage gain of the cone-HC synapse in the tiger salamander retina can also be modulated by light. Additionally, our results suggest that certain time-dependent process(es) in the synaptic cleft or postsynaptic membrane may be responsible for such modulation. 6. In addition to determining the average values of response sensitivity and chord voltage gains of the rod- and cone-HC synapses, we studied the variation of these parameters among different HCs. HCs with higher rod-HC synaptic gain had lower cone-HC synaptic gain, and HCs with lower rod-HC synaptic gain exhibited higher cone-HC synaptic gain under both dark- and light-adapted conditions. This suggests that the rod-HC and cone-HC synaptic gains in HCs are complementary to each other, and voltage responses of all HCs under dark- or light-adapted conditions are of comparable amplitudes.
摘要
  1. 在暗适应和明适应条件下,对虎纹钝口螈(Ambystoma tigrinum)幼体的视网膜进行灌流、平铺分离处理,记录其中的视杆细胞、视锥细胞和水平细胞(HCs)。2. 在暗适应条件下,HCs对500纳米的微弱光刺激的反应仅由视杆细胞介导。在线性电压范围内(接近暗电位),视杆细胞对持续0.5秒的光脉冲(500纳米,每秒每平方微米0.438个光子)的平均反应为0.41±0.06(标准差)毫伏,HCs的平均反应为1.86±0.52毫伏。视杆细胞的阶跃敏感性约为每光子平方微米秒0.94毫伏,或每个活化视紫红质分子(Rh*)每秒每视杆细胞0.032毫伏,HCs的阶跃敏感性约为每光子平方微米秒4.25±1.19毫伏或每个Rh*每秒每视杆细胞0.14±0.04毫伏。视杆细胞 - HCs突触的弦电压增益平均值为4.54,范围为2.68至7.32。3. 通过光谱减法方法,我们发现视锥细胞介导的HCs对750纳米光脉冲的平均反应,该光脉冲引发的视锥细胞平均反应为0.73±0.20毫伏,为1.15±0.31毫伏。暗适应条件下视锥细胞的阶跃敏感性为每光子平方微米秒0.0012毫伏,视锥细胞介导的HCs反应的阶跃敏感性为每光子平方微米秒0.0019毫伏。暗适应条件下视锥细胞 - HCs突触的弦电压增益平均值为1.58,范围为0.82至2.05。4. 在明适应条件下(500纳米/-2.40背景光,使视杆细胞反应脱敏但对视锥细胞反应影响不大),视锥细胞对持续0.5秒的光脉冲(每秒每平方微米0.438个光子)的平均反应为0.78±0.09毫伏,且该反应不随时间变化。背景光开始后3分钟,HCs对相同光脉冲的平均反应值为3.95±3.41毫伏,且随时间增加,直到背景光开始后约15分钟达到稳态值5.95±3.63毫伏。在这种明适应条件下,视锥细胞 - HCs突触的平均弦电压增益在背景光开始后3分钟时为5.06,15分钟时为7.63。这些值比暗适应条件下视锥细胞 - HCs突触的弦电压增益高约3至5倍。5. 背景光引起的视锥细胞 - HCs突触弦电压增益增加表明,与视杆细胞 - HCs突触类似,虎纹钝口螈视网膜中视锥细胞 - HCs突触的电压增益也可被光调节。此外,我们的结果表明,突触间隙或突触后膜中的某些时间依赖性过程可能负责这种调节。6. 除了确定视杆细胞和视锥细胞 - HCs突触的反应敏感性和弦电压增益的平均值外,我们还研究了这些参数在不同HCs之间的变化。在暗适应和明适应条件下,具有较高视杆细胞 - HCs突触增益的HCs具有较低的视锥细胞 - HCs突触增益,而具有较低视杆细胞 - HCs突触增益表现出较高的视锥细胞 - HCs突触增益。这表明HCs中视杆细胞 - HCs和视锥细胞 - HCs突触增益相互补充,并且在暗适应或明适应条件下所有HCs的电压反应幅度相当。

相似文献

1
Response sensitivity and voltage gain of the rod- and cone-horizontal cell synapses in dark- and light-adapted tiger salamander retina.暗适应和明适应虎蝾螈视网膜中视杆和视锥水平细胞突触的反应敏感性和电压增益。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3863-74. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3863.
2
Response sensitivity and voltage gain of the rod- and cone-bipolar cell synapses in dark-adapted tiger salamander retina.暗适应虎蝾螈视网膜中视杆双极细胞和视锥双极细胞突触的反应敏感性和电压增益。
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Nov;78(5):2662-73. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.5.2662.
3
Synaptic transmission from rods to horizontal cells in dark-adapted tiger salamander retina.暗适应状态下虎螈视网膜中从视杆细胞到水平细胞的突触传递。
Vision Res. 1988;28(1):1-8.
4
Input-output relations of the feedback synapse between horizontal cells and cones in the tiger salamander retina.虎蝾螈视网膜中水平细胞与视锥细胞之间反馈突触的输入-输出关系。
J Neurophysiol. 1991 May;65(5):1197-206. doi: 10.1152/jn.1991.65.5.1197.
5
Synaptic inputs from rods and cones to horizontal cells in the tiger salamander retina.虎蝾螈视网膜中视杆细胞和视锥细胞向水平细胞的突触输入。
Sci China B. 1990 Aug;33(8):946-54.
6
Electrical coupling between rods and cones in the tiger salamander retina.虎蝾螈视网膜中视杆细胞和视锥细胞之间的电耦合。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(1):275-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.275.
7
Effects of background illumination on the horizontal cell responses in the tiger salamander retina.背景光照对虎螈视网膜水平细胞反应的影响。
J Neurosci. 1989 Mar;9(3):815-27. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-03-00815.1989.
8
Independent influences of rod adaptation on cone-mediated responses to light onset and offset in distal retinal neurons.视杆适应对视网膜远端神经元中视锥介导的光起始和光熄灭反应的独立影响。
J Neurophysiol. 1990 Sep;64(3):1043-54. doi: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.1043.
9
Signal transmission from cones to amacrine cells in dark- and light-adapted tiger salamander retina.暗适应和明适应状态下虎螈视网膜中视锥细胞向无长突细胞的信号传递。
Brain Res. 2004 Dec 17;1029(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.09.032.
10
Non-linear, high-gain and sustained-to-transient signal transmission from rods to amacrine cells in dark-adapted retina of Ambystoma.蝾螈暗适应视网膜中从视杆细胞到无长突细胞的非线性、高增益和持续到瞬态的信号传递。
J Physiol. 2002 Feb 15;539(Pt 1):239-51. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013110.

引用本文的文献

1
TRPV4 affects visual signals in photoreceptors and rod bipolar cells.瞬时受体电位香草酸亚型4(TRPV4)影响光感受器和视杆双极细胞中的视觉信号。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2024 Jun 5;18:1404929. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1404929. eCollection 2024.
2
Dual-Cell Patch-Clamp Recording Revealed a Mechanism for a Ribbon Synapse to Process Both Digital and Analog Inputs and Outputs.双细胞膜片钳记录揭示了带状突触处理数字和模拟输入与输出的机制。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2021 Oct 14;15:722533. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.722533. eCollection 2021.
3
Antagonistic surround responses in different cones are mediated by feedback synapses from different horizontal cells.
不同视锥细胞的拮抗环绕反应是由来自不同水平细胞的反馈突触介导的。
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 May 15.
4
Rod and cone interactions in the retina.视网膜中的视杆细胞与视锥细胞相互作用。
F1000Res. 2018 May 23;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14412.1. eCollection 2018.
5
Physiological and morphological characterization of ganglion cells in the salamander retina.蝾螈视网膜神经节细胞的生理和形态特征
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:60-72. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
Elevated intraocular pressure decreases response sensitivity of inner retinal neurons in experimental glaucoma mice.实验性青光眼小鼠的眼内压升高会降低视网膜内层神经元的反应敏感性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2593-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419921112. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
7
Effects of histamine on light responses of amacrine cells in tiger salamander retina.组胺对虎纹蝾螈视网膜无长突细胞光反应的影响。
Neurochem Res. 2011 Apr;36(4):645-54. doi: 10.1007/s11064-010-0278-0. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
8
Role of the synaptic ribbon in transmitting the cone light response.突触 ribbon 在传递视锥细胞光反应中的作用。
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Mar;12(3):303-10. doi: 10.1038/nn.2267. Epub 2009 Feb 15.
9
Immunocytochemical analysis of photoreceptors in the tiger salamander retina.虎蝾螈视网膜中光感受器的免疫细胞化学分析。
Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(1):64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.031. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
10
Photoreceptor encoding of supersaturating light stimuli in salamander retina.蝾螈视网膜中超饱和光刺激的光感受器编码
J Physiol. 2005 Dec 1;569(Pt 2):575-85. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092239. Epub 2005 Sep 1.