• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多胎减胎术增加双胎早产及胎儿生长受限风险:一项病例对照研究。

Multifetal reduction increases the risk of preterm delivery and fetal growth restriction in twins: a case-control study.

作者信息

Silver R K, Helfand B T, Russell T L, Ragin A, Sholl J S, MacGregor S N

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Evanston Hospital, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1997 Jan;67(1):30-3. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81851-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81851-1
PMID:8986679
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcome in twin gestations resulting from multifetal reduction to "primary" twin pregnancies derived from either spontaneous conception or infertility therapy.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

University-affiliated tertiary center.

PATIENT(S): Multifetal pregnancies (quadruplets or more) reduced to twins (group A) compared with twin gestations conceived either spontaneously (group B) or through infertility therapy (group C).

INTERVENTION(S): Multifetal reduction for group A; perinatal care for groups A, B, and C.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of perinatal complications between groups including antepartum bleeding, premature membrane rupture, and preterm labor. Neonatal outcomes compared including gestational age at delivery, birth weight, incidence of fetal growth restriction, and twin discordancy.

RESULT(S): A higher incidence of idiopathic preterm labor was noted in group A cases (14/18) compared with either of the control groups (B: 26/54, or C: 24/54). As a consequence, group A had the lowest gestational age at delivery (32.6 +/- 3.9 weeks) compared with groups B (33.6 +/- 4.4 weeks) and C (36.0 +/- 3.4 weeks). Corresponding birth weights of both first- and second-born twins were significantly lower in group A compared with group C, whereas the birth weight comparison between groups A and B showed a nonsignificant difference. The proportion of pregnancies in which one or both twins weighted less than the 10th percentile was greatest in group A pregnancies (A: 5/18 versus C: 5/54). Discordant birth weight among twin pairs was proportionately greater for group A cases at both the 20% and 30% discordance levels.

CONCLUSION(S): Twin gestations resulting from multifetal reduction are at increased risk for preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and discordancy when compared with fertility therapy-derived, nonreduced twins.

摘要

目的

比较经多胎减胎术获得的双胎妊娠与自然受孕或不育治疗后的“原发性”双胎妊娠的妊娠结局。

设计

病例对照研究。

地点

大学附属三级中心。

患者

多胎妊娠(四胎及以上)减为双胎(A组),与自然受孕双胎妊娠(B组)或经不育治疗受孕的双胎妊娠(C组)进行比较。

干预措施

A组进行多胎减胎术;A、B、C组均接受围产期护理。

主要观察指标

比较各组围产期并发症,包括产前出血、胎膜早破和早产。比较新生儿结局,包括分娩时的孕周、出生体重、胎儿生长受限发生率和双胎差异。

结果

与对照组(B组:26/54,或C组:24/54)相比,A组病例特发性早产的发生率更高(14/18)。因此,A组分娩时的孕周最低(32.6±3.9周),而B组为(33.6±4.4周),C组为(36.0±3.4周)。与C组相比,A组第一和第二胎双胎的相应出生体重均显著较低,而A组和B组之间的出生体重比较无显著差异。A组妊娠中一个或两个双胎体重低于第10百分位数的妊娠比例最高(A组:5/18,C组:5/54)。在20%和30%差异水平上,A组双胎出生体重差异的比例更大。

结论

与不育治疗获得的未减胎双胎相比,经多胎减胎术获得的双胎妊娠早产、胎儿生长受限和差异的风险增加。

相似文献

1
Multifetal reduction increases the risk of preterm delivery and fetal growth restriction in twins: a case-control study.多胎减胎术增加双胎早产及胎儿生长受限风险:一项病例对照研究。
Fertil Steril. 1997 Jan;67(1):30-3. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81851-1.
2
Comparing pregnancy outcomes and loss rates in elective twin pregnancy reduction with ongoing twin gestations in a large contemporary cohort.比较大样本量当代队列中选择性双胎妊娠减胎术与继续双胎妊娠的妊娠结局和流产率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):253.e1-253.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
3
Elective fetal reduction by radiofrequency ablation in monochorionic diamniotic twins decreases adverse outcomes compared to ongoing monochorionic diamniotic twins.选择性射频消融减胎术在单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎中可降低不良结局的发生风险,优于继续妊娠的单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100447. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100447. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
4
Multifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction, except for very-high-order multiples.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):221-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70276-5.
5
Multifetal reduction of high-order multiple pregnancy: comparison of obstetrical outcome with nonreduced twin gestations.
Fertil Steril. 1995 Dec;64(6):1201-3. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57985-0.
6
[Comparative study of pregnancy outcomes between spontaneous twin pregnancies and twin pregnancies after fetal reduction in the second trimester].[孕中期自然双胎妊娠与减胎术后双胎妊娠妊娠结局的比较研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;46(12):901-4.
7
Multifetal pregnancy reductions of triplets to twins: comparison with nonreduced triplets and twins.三胎减为双胎的多胎妊娠减胎术:与未减胎的三胎及双胎的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;180(5):1268-71. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70627-7.
8
Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies after early transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction.经阴道早期多胎妊娠减胎术治疗后的双胎妊娠围生期结局。
Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
Retain singleton or twins? Multifetal pregnancy reduction strategies in triplet pregnancies with monochorionic twins.保留单胎还是双胎?三胎妊娠中单绒毛膜双胎的多胎妊娠减少策略。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):146-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
10
Multifetal pregnancy reduction: evaluation of fetal growth in the remaining twins.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;174(4):1233-8; discussion 1238-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70666-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods for Monitoring Risk of Hypoxic Damage in Fetal and Neonatal Brains: A Review.监测胎儿和新生儿大脑缺氧损伤风险的方法:综述。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2022;49(1-2):1-24. doi: 10.1159/000520987. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Prevalence of cervical insufficiency in polycystic ovarian syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征患者的宫颈机能不全发生率。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2837-42. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des193. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
3
Pregnancy outcomes of different methods for multifetal pregnancy reduction: a comparative study.不同方法减胎治疗多胎妊娠的妊娠结局:一项比较研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2008 Feb;23(1):111-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.1.111.