Ebling W F, Matsumoto Y, Levy G
Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, State University of New York at Buffalo, Amherst 14260, USA.
Pharm Res. 1996 Dec;13(12):1804-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1016072806164.
To explore, by simulation procedures, the feasibility of characterizing, from sparse data, the concentration-effect relationship of drugs with pharmacodynamic hysteresis.
For computer simulations, the concentration-effect relationship was assumed to be describable by the Sigmoid-Emax equation, the site of drug action was located in a distinct effect compartment (keo = 10 x kelim), and the pharmacokinetics were those of either a linear one- or two-compartment system. In view of the poor estimability of the parameters of the Sigmoid-Emax model under the usual clinical conditions, central compartment post-distributive drug concentrations required to elicit various intensities of effect within the therapeutic range were used as data descriptors. Effect intensities of 5 and 25, or 25 and 50 units (with the "unknown" Emax = 100 units) were targeted in multiple-dose (steady state) trial designs. From these data, drug concentrations required to produce effect intensities of 15 and 50 units were estimated by both log-linear and linear interpolation and the actual effect intensities produced by these concentrations were calculated. These simulations were performed over a wide range of Hill coefficient values (0.5 to 4.0) and dosing intervals (0.1 to 1.5 x elimination t1/2.
Acceptable results could be obtained by measuring drug concentrations and effect intensities at or near the end of a dosing interval. The largest deviations of effective concentration estimates (in terms of effect intensity) occurred at a Hill coefficient value of 0.5 and the results were very little affected by changing the dosing interval.
Our results demonstrate that effect-controlled clinical trials, with sparse data, of drugs with pharmacodynamic hysteresis for determining concentration-effect relationship in the therapeutic range are feasible in principle.